PubMed · 4787057
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J H Grant. 1973. Pornography.. https://doi.org/10.1177/002580247301300402
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The influence of sexual arousal on the quality of semen produced by masturbation was investigated. One group of 29 patients referred to our andrology outpatient clinic (group A) and one group of 14 healthy potential sperm donors filled out a questionnaire after having produced two semen samples, at least 1 month apart, by masturbation. Changes in questionnaire scores between first and second visit were compared with changes in semen characteristics between those two occasions to identify statistically significant correlations. A second group of 23 subfertility patients (group B) were asked to produce a semen sample by masturbation in a designated room at the hospital without additional sexual stimulation, and a second sample while viewing a sexually explicit video. Differences in questionnaire scores and semen characteristics obtained with visual erotic stimulation (VES) and without VES were analysed. In group A, the change in sexual arousal and change in intensity of orgasm correlated with change in semen volume (r = 0.38, P < 0.05; r = 0.48, P < 0.01 respectively). In healthy donors and group B, however, no such correlation was found. With VES in group B, significantly higher scores were given for 'feeling at ease/relaxed' (P < 0.01), 'sexual arousal' (P < 0.001), 'quality of erection' (P = 0.01), 'intensity of orgasm' (P < 0.05), 'satisfaction after orgasm' (P < 0.05), and 'ease with which orgasm was achieved' (P < 0.001) with VES compared to without VES. There was no statistically significant improvement in semen quality with VES compared to without VES. It is concluded that sexual arousal has no significant influence on the quality of an ejaculate produced by masturbation. On the other hand, providing a patient with a sexually stimulating video is obviously a facilitative factor when the patient 'has to' produce a semen sample for analysis. The use of visual erotic stimulation is recommended when patients and donors have to produce a semen sample in the university surroundings of a fertility clinic.
This paper is an interpretive analysis of the discourses within popular romance literature, with a particular focus on the genre that includes constructions of the images of nurses and nursing. An historical contrast is made along with examinations of the uses and meanings encompassed within this body of literature, and its messages for women as nurses as it reflects/creates societal change. Deviations from the formulaic nature of these works are explored. Discipline and passion are the recurring themes evident throughout in juxtapositions of romance and power differentials in the hospital/medical scene. The soft-core, sado-masochistic images evident in many titles are explored in a way that raises questions about sexuality, romance, nursing mythology, and the future of this sub-genre of the popular romance.