PubMed · 490924
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
T Suzuta. 1979-06-29. [Complement binding reaction].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/490924/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The complement fixation (CF) procedure has played a significant role in the diagnosis of infectious diseases for almost a century. It has accomplished this by functioning in serodiagnosis and by antigen identification particularly in clinical virology. Although it has been replaced by newer, more sensitive and rapid techniques for serodiagnosis, the CF assay is still important as a reference standard for clinical laboratories.
Paired serum samples from 93 patients suspected of having measles were assayed for measles virus-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA), and the results were compared with results from a complement fixation assay and an EIA for measles virus IgG. By using significant serologic rises as the standard for comparison, the IgM EIA assay had a sensitivity of 85.7%, a specificity of 81.3%, a positive predictive value of 95.7%, and a negative predictive value of 54.2%. This assay can be expected to perform well in outbreak situations.
A number of techniques is used for the serological diagnosis of hydatid disease; however previous investigations suggest variable degrees or reliability for each test. This study reports an evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of three commonly used serological tests for hydatid disease; complement fixation (CF), haemagglutination (HA) and the fluorescent antibody (FA) techniques. The results of these serological tests are compared in a series of specimens from 116 hospital patients, 21 of whom were confirmed surgically as having hydatid disease. A similar high degree of sensitivity was found for each of the three serological tests examined. The CF and HA tests gave negative results in two patients with confirmed hydatid disease, and the result of the FA test was negative in only one patient. The HA test was the most specific with no false positive reactions, but only two false positive reactions occurred with the FA test. The CF test was the least specific as the reaction was positive in nine patients without hydatid disease. When the results of both FA and HA tests were considered together, all 21 cases of hydatid disease were detected and false positive reactions occurred in only two patients.