Why rods and cones?

W Richards

doi:10.1007/bf00337290

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 497258

Why rods and cones?

W Richards

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A key problem in vision is to normalize one's lightness scale so that surface reflectances are always assigned the same gray value regardless of the illumination level. The solution requires an assessment of the relation between the strength of the illuminant and the strength of the image signal-information that is not available in the image alone. However, the level of scattered light in the optical system does provide an independent measure of the illuminant strength, and can be used to solve the lightness scale normalization problem. To do this requires a comparison between two imaging systems, each of which respond differently to the internal optical scatter. The rod and cone systems have properties that are ideally suited for such a role.

Explore related subjects

Color Perception Differential Threshold Humans Light Lighting Models, Neurological Optics and Photonics Photic Stimulation Photoreceptor Cells Scattering, Radiation Vision, Ocular Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

W Richards. 1979-08-01. Why rods and cones?. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00337290

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1979

[Color vision in glaucoma and digitalis poisoning].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Color Perception↗

PubMed1979

Optimum probabilistic processing in colour perception. I. Colour discrimination.

A comprehensive account of wavelength discrimination and colour saturation discrimination is given in terms of optimum probabilistic signal detection. The theory is a logical deduction from statistical estimation theory of the visual estimate of the spectral parameters of the stimulus. In place of geometrical concepts associated with colour-space geometry, stimulus discriminability is determined by optimum decision rules given by likelihood ratio tests on statistics that are postulated for the trichromatic responses. The classical line element theory and its formulations are deduced to be discriminability measures between signals. The different mathematical forms of classical theory are shown to correspond to different statistical constraints.

Color Perception↗

PubMed1979

Optimum probabilistic processing in colour perception. II. Colour vision as template matching.

A statistical approach to account for psychophysical phenomena in human colour vision is presented. The central visual processor is viewed as an optimum recognizer of stochastic patterns supplied by the periphery. The processor makes an optimum estimate of the spectral parameters of the stimulus, given the wavelength filter characteristics of the periphery, the stochastic nature of the information and an internal template to which the external stimulus is matched. The estimate is constrained in ways inferred from empirical phenomena. Subjective brightness of monochromatic stimuli and related constant brightness manifolds in the colour space constitute the constraint for brightness estimation. Results analogous and in accord with those of earlier line element theories are obtained. The Bezold-Brücke hue shift constitutes the basic constraint for hue estimation. The hue estimate involves interrelation between the fields in the experiment. Similarities and differences both in basic conceptions and results introduced by the template matching notions are discussed.

Color Perception↗