PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 500986

Program evaluation for effective resource management and accountability.

Abstract

A means of determining the effectiveness of public programs as a basis for justifying resource allocation to these programs is urgently needed. Program evaluation can provide the data base required for program decision-making and modification. A ten-step model for planning and carrying out an evaluation is suggested as a guideline for program personnel who may be assigned to evaluation responsibilities. Nutrition professionals must become aware of the increasing need for evaluation and of the procedures for conducting the evaluation process within programs for which they are responsible. Failure to provide documentation of adequate, on-going evaluation of effectiveness may lead to a loss of resources for the program and, ultimately, to the demise of the nutritional care program.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A C McCool. 1979. Program evaluation for effective resource management and accountability.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/500986/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

How to evaluate a PR program.

A missing element in public relations programs is evaluation. This article describes how to evaluate the effectiveness of a program by developing measurable goals and objectives.

Evaluation Studies as Topic

Bypassing obesity.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Evaluation Studies as Topic

Comparison of 99mTc and 131I scans in thyroid function studies.

Thyroid function was studied in 170 patients, using technetium-99m (99Tc) and oral radio-iodine (131I); 110 patients had normal thyroid function, and 60 had hyperthyroidism. The 20-minute 99mTc uptake gave an accurate assessment of thyroid function in 95% of patients, and the 24-hour 131I uptake was accurate in 92%. One hundred 99mTc and 131I scintiscans were compared by 3 observers. Scans obtained with each isotope were of comparable quality, and in only 1 patient were both scans of poor quality. 99mTc is as good as 131I for assessing thyroid function and morphology, but has several advantages over 131I.

Evaluation Studies as Topic