PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 5031305

The Denver Developmental Screening Test compared with the Stanford-Binet test.

J A Grant·A M Gittelsohn
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Child DevelopmentChild, PreschoolEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansIntelligence TestsMarylandPsychological TestsSocioeconomic FactorsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J A Grant, A M Gittelsohn. 1972. The Denver Developmental Screening Test compared with the Stanford-Binet test.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5031305/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Computerized adaptive testing for measuring development of young children.

Developmental indicators that are used for routine measurement in The Netherlands are usually chosen to optimally identify delayed children. Measurements on the majority of children without problems are therefore quite imprecise. This study explores the use of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to monitor the development of young children. CAT is expected to improve the measurement precision of the instrument. We do two simulation studies - one with real data and one with simulated data - to evaluate the usefulness of CAT. It is shown that CAT selects developmental indicators that maximally match the individual child, so that all children can be measured to the same precision.

Child Development↗
PubMed2007

Child development: risk factors for adverse outcomes in developing countries.

Poverty and associated health, nutrition, and social factors prevent at least 200 million children in developing countries from attaining their developmental potential. We review the evidence linking compromised development with modifiable biological and psychosocial risks encountered by children from birth to 5 years of age. We identify four key risk factors where the need for intervention is urgent: stunting, inadequate cognitive stimulation, iodine deficiency, and iron deficiency anaemia. The evidence is also sufficient to warrant interventions for malaria, intrauterine growth restriction, maternal depression, exposure to violence, and exposure to heavy metals. We discuss the research needed to clarify the effect of other potential risk factors on child development. The prevalence of the risk factors and their effect on development and human potential are substantial. Furthermore, risks often occur together or cumulatively, with concomitant increased adverse effects on the development of the world's poorest children.

Child Development↗