PubMed · 5107572
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J H Merenstein. 1971-02-22. Laboratory profile screening.. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1971.03180210071026
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A simulated body fluid (SBF) with ion concentrations approximately equal to those of human blood plasma has been used widely for in vitro assessment of the bioactivity of artificial materials and for the formation of bone-like apatite on various substrates. The ion concentrations of a conventional SBF (c-SBF) are, however, not exactly equal to those of blood plasma. In the present study, a revision of c-SBF was made to prepare new SBFs (r-SBF, i-SBF, and m-SBF) with ion concentrations equal to or closer to those of blood plasma. The ion concentrations of the r-SBF and i-SBF were designed to be equal to those of blood plasma in total and dissociated amounts, respectively. The m-SBF was designed to have a total ion concentration equal to that of blood plasma, except for the concentration of HCO(-) (3), which was set to the saturated level with respect to calcite. The ion concentrations and pH of the as-prepared new SBFs were found to be equal to those of the nominal values. Upon sealed storage, the r-SBF and i-SBF showed no change in ion concentrations for up to 4 weeks at 5 degrees C, and up to 2 weeks at 36.5 degrees C, but thereafter they showed a decrease in HCO(-) (3) concentration and an increase in pH. Under the same storage conditions, the c-SBF and m-SBF showed no change in ion concentrations and pH values over a period of up to 8 weeks. These results indicate that the r-SBF and i-SBF are less stable than the c-SBF and m-SBF in terms of changes in ion concentrations relative to storage period. The m-SBF is optimal for in vitro bioactivity assessment of artificial materials and for biomimetic production of bone-like apatite.
The analytical challenges of Pt determination by ICP-SFMS posed by different human tissues and fluids have been critically assessed. Investigated samples were (1) urine, (2) serum of cancer patients sampled during chemotherapy with carboplatin, (3) microdialysates (20 micro L sample volume) collected from tumor and non-tumor tissue, and, finally-for the first time-(4) human lung tissue to study background concentrations of inhaled platinum. Sample preparation involved microwave digestion and open vessel treatment or simple dilution (microdialysates). Depending on the sample preparation and introduction systems used (microconcentric nebulization, ultrasonic nebulization with and without membrane desolvation) excellent procedural detection limits (3s criterion) of 0.35 pg g(-1) for urine, 420 pg g(-1) for serum, 400 pg g(-1) for lung tissue and 13 pg g(-1) for microdialysates could be obtained. Ultratrace concentrations of 1-40 pg g(-1), and 1000-3000 pg g(-1) were measured in urine and human lung tissue, respectively, as typical for samples in environmental studies. Quantification was carried out by IDMS and standard addition in the case of urine samples. Internal standardization could not correct for non-spectral interferences in external calibration. In the serum and microdialysates of patients during chemotherapy with carboplatin, elevated Pt levels ranging between 0.01 and 10 micro g g(-1) were determined by external calibration ((195)Pt isotope). For all investigated samples spectral interferences could be excluded by following different strategies. High-resolution control measurements ((194)Pt, (195)Pt) were performed in the case of elevated Pt levels, i.e. for microdialysates and serum samples. An Hf/Pt ratio of 0.4 was determined in human lung samples. An HfO formation ratio of 0.2% was assessed for standard solutions at the present experimental conditions, revealing that the contribution of (179)Hf(16)O, (178)Hf(17)O, (177)Hf(18)O to the (195)Pt isotope signal used for quantification was not significant.