PubMed · 5132768
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
P Spiegel. [Flowmeter test].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5132768/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare cardiorespiratory and recovery effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane, and halothane in horses. ANIMALS: 8 clinically normal horses (4 mares, 4 geldings), 5 to 12 years old. PROCEDURE: Inhalation anesthesia was maintained for 90 minutes with sevoflurane, isoflurane, or halothane. Anesthesia depth was maintained at 1.5 minimum alveolar concentration of halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane, then was reduced at 30 and 60 minutes. A surgical plane of anesthesia was reinduced by administration of ketamine or thiopental or by increasing the fractional inspired concentration of sevoflurane. Cardiovascular and pulmonary variables were recorded and compared among inhalation anesthetics. Recovery was monitored, and subjective assessment of recovery quality was performed. RESULTS: Hemodynamic and pulmonary indices during sevoflurane anesthesia were similar to those of isoflurane. Cardiac output and systemic arterial pressure decreased less during sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia than during halothane anesthesia. After 90 minutes, cardiac output was greater for sevoflurane and isoflurane, respectively, compared with halothane. Mean arterial pressure was similar for all three anesthetic agents. Respiratory rate for sevoflurane and isoflurane was less than that for halothane. This apparent respiratory depression correlated with greater increase in PaCO2 and decreased pH when sevoflurane and isoflurane were compared with halothane. Recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia was qualitatively similar and superior to recovery from isoflurane and halothane, respectively. Time to standing did not differ significantly between sevoflurane and isoflurane, but was shorter than halothane. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane induced cardiorespiratory effects that were comparable to those of isoflurane and halothane. Cardiac output was greater and respiratory rate was less than that for halothane at 1.5 MAC. Sevoflurane anesthesia was characterized by good control of anesthesia depth during induction, maintenance, and recovery. Recovery time after sevoflurane anesthesia was comparable to that for isoflurane, and recovery was smooth and controlled in a manner consistent with recovery from halothane.
Pulmonary toxicity of inhaled materials is often evaluated by (repetitive) assessment of the composition of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid or of epithelial lining fluid (ELF) in sheep and lambs. Knowledge of the typical constituents of these fluids obtained from healthy animals is essential for identification of pathologic changes. Few studies have dealt with normal constituents of BAL fluid or ELF in sheep and lamb. The comparability of these studies, however, is limited for reasons concerning the choice of model and BAL technique. The biochemical and cellular composition of alveolar ELF obtained by a standardized BAL procedure was examined in 15 pento-barbital anesthetized 4 months old Merino lambs unexposed to inhaled substances. ELF volume was calculated by using the urea dilution method. We found 20.3 x 10(5) leucocytes per ml ELF, 87.5% of which were alveolar macrophages. Basophils and neutrophils were practically absent while 5% of the counted cells were lymphocytes. 76% of recovered cells were viable. The ELF contained 7 mg/ml total protein; enzyme activities of LDH and AP were 1692 U/l and 145 U/l, respectively.