PubMed · 5141229
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
G Williams. 1971. Kaiser delivery system: less utilization, more productivity.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5141229/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Laparoscopic surgery necessitates that operations be performed via a television screen; therefore, image quality is crucial in determining the final outcome. Electronic imaging systems are constantly undergoing revisions and incorporating new ideas. Recently, we have been confronted with a variety of systems, and we, as operators, have no idea what the differences are between the old and the newer systems. As clinicians, we have no electronic yardstick available to compare the options presented or to check the specifications. This study examines critical aspects of image perception. General surgeons, gynecologists, operating-room nurses, as well as allied health personnel all experienced in laparoscopic surgery participated as test subjects. A blinded study was performed in which various camera systems (single chip, three-chip, digitized and nondigitized) were displayed in random fashion. Porcine abdominal areas were displayed using the various imaging units. Participants graded image perception based on the following characteristics: sharpness, color, contrast, and depth of field. The audience were blinded to the types, brand, and number of cameras utilized. A significant preference was shown for digitized systems (P < 0.0001). Also, digitized single-chip cameras scored higher than three-chip cameras (P < 0.05). We propose thorough testing by surgeons and nursing personnel before deciding what type of equipment to purchase.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study investigated physical therapist assistants' (PTAs) perceptions of the documented roles of PTAs and compared those perceptions with those of physical therapists from a previous study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire that described 79 physical therapy activities was distributed to a sample (n = 400) of PTAs derived from the American Physical Therapy Association membership. The response rate was 56% (n = 225). Respondents indicated whether each activity was included in the documentation describing PTA roles. Discriminant analyses were used to determine whether demographic factors predicted the pattern of responses. In addition, meta-analytic techniques were used to determine whether PTA responses were different from those of physical therapists gathered previously. RESULTS: The greatest agreement of PTA opinions with published guidelines occurred for treatment implementation activities, and the lowest level of agreement occurred for items designated as administrative activities. Responses of PTAs were different from those of physical therapists on 21 of the 79 activities. The greatest number of these differences occurred for evaluative functions (n = 9). Physical therapist assistants' perceptions of documented PTA roles were generally less consistent with published guidelines than were those of physical therapists. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Physical therapist assistants' perceptions of the roles of the PTA were, for some activities, not consistent with written guidelines. Using the data provided in this study, discussions to revise the documentation of the scope of PTA practice may focus on those activities for which disagreement between PTAs and physical therapists exists and for which opinions differ markedly from published guidelines. [Robinson AJ, DePalma MT, McCall M. Physical therapist assistants' perceptions of the documented roles of the physical therapist assistant.