PubMed · 5157103
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M L Hoffman. 1971. Identification and conscience development.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5157103/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
CONTEXT: Controversy exists over the fact that physicians have regular contact with the pharmaceutical industry and its sales representatives, who spend a large sum of money each year promoting to them by way of gifts, free meals, travel subsidies, sponsored teachings, and symposia. OBJECTIVE: To identify the extent of and attitudes toward the relationship between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry and its representatives and its impact on the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of physicians. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search was conducted for English-language articles published from 1994 to present, with review of reference lists from retrieved articles; in addition, an Internet database was searched and 5 key informants were interviewed. STUDY SELECTION: A total of 538 studies that provided data on any of the study questions were targeted for retrieval, 29 of which were included in the analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted by 1 author. Articles using an analytic design were considered to be of higher methodological quality. DATA SYNTHESIS: Physician interactions with pharmaceutical representatives were generally endorsed, began in medical school, and continued at a rate of about 4 times per month. Meetings with pharmaceutical representatives were associated with requests by physicians for adding the drugs to the hospital formulary and changes in prescribing practice. Drug company-sponsored continuing medical education (CME) preferentially highlighted the sponsor's drug(s) compared with other CME programs. Attending sponsored CME events and accepting funding for travel or lodging for educational symposia were associated with increased prescription rates of the sponsor's medication. Attending presentations given by pharmaceutical representative speakers was also associated with nonrational prescribing. CONCLUSION: The present extent of physician-industry interactions appears to affect prescribing and professional behavior and should be further addressed at the level of policy and education.
OBJECTIVE: Dysphagia is the most common complication of antireflux surgery. Temporary dysphagia occurs in addition to persistent dysphagia because of technical or physiological problems. Temporary dysphagia may be due to the patient's personal perception or faulty eating habits. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the patient's personality as it relates to temporary dysphagia and individual impairment. METHODS: Several studies have used the construct of personality known as "health locus of control" to predict health-related behavior and convalescence after medical or surgical treatments. This study investigates the predictability of the subjective degree of dysphagia and its perceived degree of impairment in relation to the health locus of control after laparoscopic so-called "floppy" Nissen fundoplication in 90 patients. Several questionnaires and single-item questions were given to the patients preoperatively, and 1 wk, 6 wk, and 3 months after surgery. The answers to the questions provided the data for this study. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 92% of the patients had no dysphagia and 8% had a mild subjective degree of dysphagia. Temporary postoperative dysphagia was found in approximately 50% of the patients 1 wk after surgery. The intensity of the dysphagia ranged among mild (18%), moderate (15%), and severe (16%). Three months postoperatively about 80% had no dysphagia and only 2% severe dysphagia. Correlations between the construct of personality and the intensity of postoperative dysphagia and its impairment revealed a significant relationship at all times. Patients with high expectations for their own health-related abilities (internal control) had less dysphagia (r = -0.78 after 1 wk [p<0.001], r = -0.71 after 6 wk [p<0.001], and r = -0.64 after 3 months [p<0.001]), compared with patients who believed that their convalescence depended more on luck, chance, or fate (external control) (r = 0.67 after 1 wk [p<0.01], r = 0.72 after 6 wk [p<0.001], and r = 0.63 after 3 months [p<0.01]). These results are highly significant. The correlation between health locus of control the degree of a subjective impairment from perceived dysphagia showed similar results (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The subjective degree of dysphagia and the perceived impairment as a result of laparoscopic antireflux surgery can be predicted according to the personality of the patient. Those patients with low expectations for their own abilities can be identified before surgery, thereby allowing adaptation techniques to be applied that could improve the results and well-being of patients after antireflux surgery.