Pseudoaccommodation and progressive addition lenses.

W E Preston; N Roth

doi:10.1016/0039-6257(79)90130-9

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 515945

Pseudoaccommodation and progressive addition lenses.

W E Preston·N Roth

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The limitations of traditional multifocal lenses to replace normal ocular accommodation are well known. The recent development of progressive addition lenses circumvent many of those problems, furnishing smoothly varying power in desired amounts for various distances and allowing freedom from distracting lines. Optical characteristics, screening considerations, prescribing and fitting requirements, and the advantages and limitations of progressive addition lenses are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Accommodation, Ocular Eyeglasses Humans Optics and Photonics Prescriptions Vision Disorders Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

W E Preston, N Roth. Pseudoaccommodation and progressive addition lenses.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6257(79)90130-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Refractive state, corneal curvature, accommodative range and ocular anatomy of the Asian elephant (Elephas maximus).

The resting refractive state of six mature, female, Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) was determined using streak retinoscopy and neutralizing video retinoscopy. The amplitude of accommodation was also measured by neutralizing video retinoscopy of two animals and the corneal curvatures of three animals was measured by photokeratoscopy. The net spherical refraction was found to be +0.23 D. No difference was observed between cyclopleged and non-cyclopleged eyes (data from three animals), nor was there any difference between right and left eyes. Nine of the twelve eyes refracted had > or = 0.5 D astigmatism. The mean corneal power, as measured by photokeratometry was 21.3 D (SD = 1.8 D). There was a tendency towards with-the-rule corneal astigmatism in our sample (mean value: 1.2 D), though it did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.06). Two elephants were examined using neutralizing video photoretinoscopy. They were able to accommodate through 3 D. Three fixed eyes from three different elephants were obtained for gross and microscopic examination. The mean axial length of the eye was 38.75 mm and the lens had an axial diameter of approx. 10 mm. The posterior sclera was thick (8.0-8.5 mm). Histologically, the cornea was comprised of five distinct layers. A thin, meridionally oriented smooth ciliary muscle was identified. Individual muscle fibers were also observed associated with the posterior trabeculae of the uveal meshwork.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

PubMed1992

Cortical area related to lens accommodation in cat.

Lens accommodation was evoked by microstimulation in the lateral suprasylvian (LS) area in cats. The accommodative response was monitored continuously with an infrared optometer. The low threshold areas related to lens accommodation were located in the lower parts of the medial banks of the middle suprasylvian sulcus from A1 to A4, and also in the fundus of the sulcus at A8 in the stereotaxic coordinates. The latency of the onset of the accommodative responses evoked by stimulating the caudal area (A1-A4) was shorter than that evoked by stimulating the rostral area (around A8). Electrical stimulation was also attempted at the subcortical area in order to study the output pathway from the LS area. It was determined that the low threshold sites in the LS cortex of A1-A4 extend rostrally along the lateral ventricle in the brainstem, then ventrally into the midbrain. These findings suggest that there are two cortical areas related to lens accommodation: caudal and rostral, and the caudal accommodation area may provide the output signal for the subcortical system.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

PubMed1992

Variability of fixation disparity and accommodation when viewing a CRT visual display unit.

Fixation disparity and accommodation were measured while subjects viewed a target on a cathode ray tube at a 50 cm viewing distance. The psychophysical method of sequential testing was used. For measuring fixation disparity a series of brief dichoptic nonius targets was presented and the direction of perceived misalignment was reported by the subject. From these responses the psychometric function of fixation disparity can be derived which gives not only the mean fixation disparity but also the range of fluctuation during the period of measurement. During a 5 min period, this range was +/- 1.5 min arc averaged over subjects, when expressed as the range in which instantaneous fixation disparity fell with a probability of 68%. Repeated measurements on 5 days within 2 weeks gave a larger range of +/- 2 min arc. However, individual results can differ considerably from these average values. Repeated measurements and the analysis of the psychometric function can provide a more complete description of individual binocular status than is obtained with a single adjustment of continuously visible nonius targets. Laser optometry revealed that, compared to the stimulus distance of 50 cm, accommodation lagged behind in the range 1-2 D. The two display modes of bright characters on dark background and vice versa gave very similar results.

Accommodation, Ocular↗