PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 526196

Luganda speech audiometry.

C Nsamba
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Monosyllabic, quasi-monosyllabic and disyllabic word lists have been constructed from Luganda language material. These lists readily afford a means for determining speech-hearing ability for Luganda-speaking subjects. The speech-audiometric curve obtained on normally hearing Luganda-speaking subjects with monosyllabic material has a form which is similar to that for the normal curve obtained with English monosyllabic word lists on English-speaking subjects. As indicated by previous authors, the form of the speech-audiometric curve is that of a cumulative distribution, making presentation of the data on arithmetical probability paper convenient. Since monosyllabic words are uncommon in the Luganda and other Bantu languages, it is considered that quasimonosyllabic lists might be preferred in clinical situations.

Explore related subjects

Audiometry, SpeechHumansLinguisticsPhoneticsUgandaJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Nsamba. Luganda speech audiometry.. https://doi.org/10.3109/00206097909072642

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

The role of localization in visual reinforcement audiometry.

The response task employed in visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) has been characterized both as a localization response and, alternatively, as a pure operant conditioning behavior independent of localization. This study examined the role of localization in VRA conditioning and threshold procedures by varying the localization information provided to normal infants. Results indicate (a) that the VRA response is not contingent on localization but (b) that performance may be significantly influenced by localization. The findings suggest that any variable that alters proper localization cues, including equipment arrangement or impaired auditory function, may degrade response performance.

Audiometry, Speech↗
PubMed1992

[Vocals in silence and noise. A simple test of resistance of intelligibility in noisy environment].

We have all noticed that there was no coincidence between the conventional audiometric tests--tonal, vocal, Metz tests--and the degree of impairment of understandability in noisy environments that the patients report. Some of them handle this problem better than these conventional tests suggest, others less well. The aim of this study is to take account of this dominating functional complaint: impairment in noisy conditions, and to assess it in order to follow up its evolution after medical, surgical and prosthetic treatments. The aim of the authors has been to describe an easy examination to be implemented in any ENT surgery fitted with a free-field vocal testing equipment. The results show that this test cas differentiate between "noise-resistant" subjects and those that do not "resist" well. The discussion defines the limitations of this test, which are due to its deliberate simplicity, and the caution required for its psychoacoustic and physiological interpretation. The conclusion confirms its merits, since it can discriminate and help choose more accurate tests--temporal tests, frequency selectiveness charts, twin-ear tests, cognitive AEP.

Audiometry, Speech↗
PubMed1992

[Vocal audiometry: the "phonatome" recognition test. Principle, technique, initial results].

Whereas tonal audiometry makes it possible to analyze the elementary deficits of hearing, vocal audiometry enables an overall synthetic assessment of these deficits. The vocal material usually used is composed of lists of sentences, words, logatomes or even phonemes. The authors suggest resorting to lists of phonetically balanced phonatomes or diphonemes. Among the advantages this technique offers, are the rapidity of the test, the excellent representativity of the most informative acoustic components of speech and the elimination of the extralinguistic factors of speech recognition.

Audiometry, Speech↗