PubMed · 5273141
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
V B Sokolov. [Dental forceps].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5273141/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The Flex-R file was compared with the Onyx nickel-titanium file in respect to canal center movement and final canal area after balanced-force instrumentation. Forty-two root canals in extracted human molars were divided into two equal groups of 21, in all of which the angle of curvature ranged from 20 to 40 degrees. After mounting in a mold, each root was sectioned at two locations, providing an apical and a coronal section. Pre- and postinstrumentational 35-mm photographic slides of each section were superimposed, projected, traced, and then scanned into a computer. From these computerized pre- and postinstrumentation images, the movement of the canal center and the area of each canal were computed at both the apical and coronal sections. Results showed no significant difference in canal center movement or postinstrumentation area when Flex-R or Onyx files were used at the apical section. Coronally, the Flex-R files demonstrated more movement of the canal center. No significant correlation was found between the angle of root curvature and canal movement or the angle of root curvature and postinstrumentation canal area.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This study describes the variations in the reproducibility of attachment level recordings for different subjects at different examinations. Twenty patients with different degrees of periodontal disease were recruited and examined bi-monthly for their attachment levels using an electronic probe in two quadrants and a conventional probe in the other two quadrants. At each of the 7 examinations attachment level recordings were repeated with the appropriate probe after approximately 30 minutes. Results demonstrate that the reproducibility of attachment level recordings was slightly better for the conventional probe than for the electronic probe. Attachment level recording reproducibility varied considerably between subjects and between examinations for the same subject. Aggregation of attachment level recordings in the form of mean tooth values or mean individual values reduced the range of the differences, but considerable between-subject and between-examination variation was still seen. These results indicate that no single uniformly valid estimate of attachment level reproducibility exists which can be used to set diagnostic thresholds such that a minimum number of incorrect diagnoses are made.