PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 529077

After-effects of small adapting fields.

M M Hayhoe
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

1. Sensitivity to a small test probe in the centre of a small, steady background is less than when the background is large (sensitization). When an equiluminous steady annulus is added to the region surrounding a small background, rod threshold takes several minutes to stabilize at its new, lower level. The after-effects of the small background follow a time course characteristic of cortical adaptation. 2. The sensitivity loss and time course of recovery after intense bleaching lights in the cone system depend markedly on the size of the retinal region bleached, although no such effect is observed in the rod system. If a steady annular surround is added to the region surrounding the bleached patch, threshold falls rapidly to the value it would have after a large-area bleach of the same intensity. 3. The interaction between bleaches and steady surrounds suggests that bleaches produce long-lasting signals in the cone receptors. 4. The different temporal properties of sensitization on rod backgrounds and sensitization after cone bleaches suggest that different mechanisms underlie the two phenomena. 5. In cone vision, if light is added to the area surrounding a small, steady background, the subsequent readjustment takes minutes to complete, as it does in rod vision. But in addition, for cones, a large proportion of the sensitivity loss caused by the small background can be rapidly restored, as it is with cone bleaches. 6. The above results, together with the known absence of sensitization in rod dark adaptation, are consistent with the hypothesis that sensitization occurs at least partly at the retinal level in the cone system, but not (or only weakly) in the rod system, and that there is an additional, probably cortical elevation, common to rod and cone systems, for small backgrounds, but not for small, brief bleaches.

Explore related subjects

Adaptation, OcularDark AdaptationHumansPhotoreceptor CellsRetinal PigmentsJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M M Hayhoe. 1979. After-effects of small adapting fields.. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012996

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: dissociation of shape from size.

We measured the accuracy with which subjects judged that a square or circle was perfectly symmetrical i.e. that aspect ratio (a/b) was exactly unity (where a and b were, respectively, the vertical and horizontal dimensions). Errors were remarkably small, ranging from 0.7 to 0.4% for the judgement of squareness and from 1.4 to < 0.1% for the judgement of circularity. Precision in judging aspect ratio was measured by requiring subjects to judge whether the aspect ratio (a/b)TEST of a test rectangle was greater or less than the aspect ratio (a/b)REF of a reference rectangle. Similar measurements were made for elliptical targets. To ensure that subjects based judgements on aspect ratio rather than a, b or (a-b), the area of each successive presentation was varied randomly. The just-discriminable percentage change of aspect ratio was as low as 1.6% at (a/b)REF = 1.0 (i.e. for a square or circular reference), and rose progressively as (a/b)REF was made progressively larger or smaller than 1.0. Aspect ratio discrimination threshold was independent of mean area over a sixteen-fold range of 0.25-4.0 deg2. For both rectangles and ellipses, the best value of aspect ratio discrimination threshold corresponded to a precision of encoding a and b of 14 sec arc or better. In further experiments, the method of constant stimuli was used to measure an aspect ratio aftereffect produced by adapting separately to rectangles of (a/b)ADAPT equal to 1.5, 1.0 and (1/1.5). Similar aftereffects were obtained whether the area of the test stimulus was fixed or varied randomly from trial to trial, and whether the test stimulus was rectangular or elliptical. The aftereffect could not be explained in terms of fatigue of neurons sensitive to linear dimension a or b. Nor could the aftereffect be explained in terms of the "contour repulsion" hypothesis, or in terms of orientation discrimination. We conclude (1) that the same neural mechanism determines aspect ratio discrimination threshold for rectangles and ellipses and (2) that this mechanism is sensitive to aspect ratio independently of linear dimensions. We propose that aspect ratio perception is determined by the balance of excitation of two pools of neurons that are selectively sensitive to different, but overlapping ranges of (a/b). One pool prefers aspect ratios > 1.0 and the others prefer aspect ratios < 1.0. We suppose that the two pools respond identically to changes in area (a * b).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1992

Dynamic noise backgrounds facilitate target fading.

With strict fixation, a small uniform target of medium contrast, placed at 10 deg eccentricity, faded much faster when presented on a dynamic random noise background than on either a static random noise background or a uniform background of the same luminance. Time to first disappearance was between 10 and 16 sec when the background was dynamic, 26 sec when it was static, and 57 sec when it was uniform. Times were shortest for temporal noise frequencies of the background between 3.5 and 15 Hz. These findings are unexpected: the frequent change of pixel contrast at the edge of the target should perceptually enhance the border, make it less susceptible to local adaptation, and prevent fading. Instead, dynamic random noise facilitates, rather than suppresses fading. Three potential mechanisms are discussed: edge perturbation, jerk effect and surround induction.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1992

Red-green and yellow-blue opponent-color responses as a function of retinal eccentricity.

Using the hue cancellation technique, I measured the spectral sensitivities of red-green (r-g) and yellow-blue (y-b) opponent-color responses of two color-normal observers at 0 (fovea), 3.3, 10, 21, and 31 degrees along the horizontal meridian of the temporal retina. The stimulus size as a function of retinal eccentricity was varied according to the cortical magnification factor. I found that the net spectral sensitivity (i.e. corrected for macular pigment) of the r-g channel was approximately constant as a function of retinal eccentricity. On the other hand, the net spectral sensitivity of the y-b channel was not constant. For the y-b channel I found a constant spectral sensitivity as a function of eccentricity when no macular correction was made. This means that the y-b system changes its yellow and blue responses with eccentricity to counterbalance the effects of macular pigment.

Adaptation, Ocular↗