PubMed · 5533613
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
B N Branch. 1970-11-16. Contraceptive hormones.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5533613/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Amphicrine carcinomas of the stomach, defined by dual exocrine and neuroendocrine differentiation within the same neoplastic cell, are exceedingly rare. MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) is an autosomal recessive polyposis syndrome characterized by multiple colorectal adenomas and variable upper gastrointestinal involvement; however, amphicrine carcinomas have not been previously documented in this setting. We report a gastric amphicrine carcinoma arising in the background of extensive fundic gland polyposis in a patient with MAP. Endoscopy revealed a 3.5-cm flat elevated lesion in the gastric fundus amid extensive fundic gland polyposis. Histologically, the tumor consisted of a single population of cells exhibiting combined glandular and neuroendocrine differentiation without zonal or biphasic architecture, and many of these cells demonstrated true amphicrine morphology. Immunohistochemistry confirmed co-expression of cytokeratin and the neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin in the same cell population. Germline targeted next-generation sequencing identified biallelic MUTYH variants in trans (c.733C>T, p.Arg245Cys [likely pathogenic]; c.842C>T, p.Ala281Val [variant of uncertain significance]), supporting a diagnosis of MAP. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a gastric amphicrine carcinoma in a MAP patient, expanding the spectrum of MAP-associated upper gastrointestinal neoplasia and underscoring the importance of vigilant endoscopic surveillance in hereditary polyposis syndromes.
BACKGROUND: In prostate cancer cell lines, androgen receptor (AR) coactivators modulate the transcriptional activity of AR. However, very little is known about their expression in normal prostate tissue and during progression to cancer. METHODS: AR and coactivators ARA54, ARA55, ARA70, and SRC1 RNA were analyzed by RT-PCR in normal and tumoral tissues of the same prostate, in prostate cell lines, and after hormonal treatments of prostate epithelial cells. RESULTS: AR-coactivators were expressed in normal and tumoral tissues and in cultured prostate cells; only ARA55 expression was decreased in tumoral relative to normal tissue of all seven prostates analyzed. It was not expressed in LNCaP and DU145 cancer cells and low in PNT2 immortalized cells in which all coactivator's expression were down regulated by DHT and up regulated by E2. In addition, coactivator's expression was increased in hyperplastic relative to normal prostate fibroblasts. CONCLUSIONS: ARA55 is both an AR coactivator and a focal adhesion protein (Hic-5). Its role in the progression of prostate carcinoma may therefore involve these two different functions. Its decrease in cancer tissue suggests that it plays a different role than that expected, namely, facilitate cell proliferation and therefore mobility and metastasis.
PURPOSE: A genetic progression model for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC) has been established and implies the presence of transcriptional dysregulation as a consequence of accumulation of genetic alterations. Although expression array data have been provided for HNSC, the timing of transcriptional dysregulation in the progression from normal mucosa to dyplastic epithelium to invasive HNSC has not been described. Here, we describe a transcriptional progression model of HNSC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Expression arrays representing >12,000 genes and expressed sequence tags were used to examine malignant lesions (M), premalignant lesions (PM), distant, histopathologically normal mucosa from patients with premalignant or malignant lesions (MN), and normal mucosa from the upper aerodigestive tract of patients with noncancer diagnoses (N). Significance analysis of microarrays, hierarchical clustering, and principal components analysis was used to identify genes with differential expression patterns. RESULTS: Using a false discovery rate of <5% for significance analysis of microarray, the M group revealed 965 up-regulated and 1106 down-regulated genes relative to the N group. The PM group demonstrated 108 up-regulated and 226 down-regulated genes relative to the N group, whereas the M group demonstrated only 5 up-regulated and 13 down-regulated genes relative to the PM group. Both hierarchical cluster analysis and principal components analysis revealed a consistent separation between the N, PM, and M groups, with a closer association between the PM and M groups. To provide independent validation of the microarray data, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR was performed for a significantly up-regulated gene, integrin alpha 6, correlating well with microarray data (linear regression analysis, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Similarly to the genetic progression model of HNSC, this transcriptional model shows that the majority of alterations occurs before the development of malignancy and identifies key targets of transcriptional dysregulation during progression from a normal to a premalignant state and from a premalignant to a malignant state.