PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 557907

A practical reporting and evaluation system for intervention programs: guiding principles and potential uses.

D Zalkind·H Zelon·M Moore·A Kaluzny
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The continued existence of intervention programs is contingent on the ability to answer basic questions such as "What is your program doing?" and "Why should we fund your program?" This paper outlines basic principles and describes a practical reporting and supplemental evaluation system that can be used by administrators of even the smallest intervention program.

Explore related subjects

Community Mental Health ServicesCrisis InterventionDecision MakingEvaluation Studies as TopicFinancing, OrganizedGovernment AgenciesHumansRecordsSubstance-Related DisordersUnited StatesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Zalkind, H Zelon, M Moore, A Kaluzny. 1977. A practical reporting and evaluation system for intervention programs: guiding principles and potential uses.. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.67.4.370

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Assessment of psychological care in general practice.

OBJECTIVE: To pilot a method of assessing psychological care by general practitioners. DESIGN: Prospective examination of psychological care given in general practice by using general health questionnaire with predetermined quantifiable and case specific indices of outcome established at the original consultation. SETTING: Rural general practice in Clwyd, North Wales. SUBJECTS: 447 consecutive adult general practice attenders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Three month follow up consultation rates, one year retrospective consultation rates, continuity of care, changes in general health questionnaire scores at follow up, general satisfaction, and acceptability of outcome measures. RESULTS: The principal and trainee identified 72 patients with psychological problems, 46 of whom had new conditions. 133 patients scored over 6 on the 28 item general health questionnaire, 33 of whom were identified as new cases by the general practitioners. 62 patients were seen at follow up, including 23 patients identified by the questionnaire but not by the doctor. The doctors used diagnostic terms to describe the presenting condition in 38 cases. At three month follow up the general health questionnaire scores had fallen by more than 5 points in 22/39 patients identified and managed by doctors and 11/23 identified by the questionnaire. The agreed index of good outcome was almost or completely achieved by 20 of the 39 patients managed by doctors. CONCLUSION: Quantifiable methods of evaluating the quality of the structure, process, and outcome of psychological care can be achieved in general practice.

Community Mental Health Services↗
PubMed1992

The TAPS project. 16: Difficult to place, long term psychiatric patients: risk factors for failure to resettle long stay patients in community facilities.

OBJECTIVE: To identify patients who could not be resettled in the community as part of the closure plans of two psychiatric hospitals and to determine their numbers and risk factors for failure. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study of the closure of Friern and Claybury psychiatric hospitals. PATIENTS: The first third (369) of long stay psychiatric patients to be resettled. OUTCOME MEASURES: Reasons for patients being readmitted to hospital and not leaving the patients' service needs. RESULTS: 22--6% of both hospitals' long stay patients--were not successfully resettled in the community. Eighteen continuing care places per 100,000 of catchment area population seem to be required for this group. Patients whose placements were unsuccessful were usually readmitted because of a deterioration of their mental state and aggressive behaviour, both of which persisted and necessitated their continuing stay in hospital, often in a locked ward. Risk factors associated with failure were a high level of psychosis; a diagnosis of paranoid psychosis; incontinence; and being male. But having a social network, especially a large one, seemed to aid successful placement in the community. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation efforts should be focused on the characteristics of these patients that put them at risk of failing to succeed in community placements.

Community Mental Health Services↗
PubMed1992

[Good will].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Community Mental Health Services↗