PubMed · 5676369
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D L Praeger, R M Martell. 1968. Head-mounted squint light for motility testing.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(68)91548-1
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
An old explanation of the moon illusion holds that various cues place the horizon moon at an effectively greater distance than the elevated moon. Although both moons have the same angular size, the horizon moon must be perceived as larger. More recent explanations hold that differences in accommodation or other factors cause the elevated moon to appear smaller. As a result of this illusory difference in size, the elevated moon appears to be more distant than the horizon moon. These two explanations, both based on the geometry of stereopsis, lead to two diametrically opposed hypotheses. That is, a depth interval at a long distance is associated with a smaller binocular disparity, whereas an equal depth interval at a smaller distance is associated with a larger disparity. We conducted experiments involving artificial moons and confirmed the hypothesis that the horizon moon is at a greater perceptual distance. Moreover, when a moon of constant angular size was moved closer it was also perceived as growing smaller, which is consistent with the older explanation. Although Emmert's law does not predict the size-distance relationship over long distances, we conclude that the horizon moon is perceived as larger because the perceptual system treats it as though it is much farther away. Finally, we observe that recent explanations substitute perceived size for angular size as a cue to distance. Thus, they imply that perceptions cause perceptions.
UNLABELLED: To study motor and sensory responses in vertical fusion at different angles of horizontal vergence in normal humans. METHODS: The study included 12 normal subjects. A cross (+) extending 3.4 degrees x3.2 degrees was presented dichoptically. Vertical disparity was introduced by changing the vertical position of the cross in front of one eye. The disparity was incremented by 0.08 degrees every 8 s. Distance viewing was tested with 1 degrees of convergence demand, near vision with 6-15 degrees convergence demand. Eye movements were recorded using three-axis search coils. RESULTS: Vertical fusion capability was larger at near vision than at distance in 9 of 12 subjects. For the entire group, total vertical fusion capability (motor plus sensory response) differed between distance (mean 1.68 degrees ) and near (mean 2.39 degrees ). The motor component differed significantly between distance (mean 1.42 degrees ) and near (mean 2.13 degrees ). No difference in the sensory component was seen between distance (mean 0.26 degrees ) and near (mean 0.27 degrees ). CONCLUSIONS: Vertical fusion capability increases with convergence. This increase is mainly due to an increase of the motor response.
PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of measurement by the Nikon Retinomax handheld autorefractor and its ability to relax accommodation. SETTING: Pediatric Section, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Mainz, Germany. METHODS: To perform a series of comparative measurements, autorefractor readings were obtained on healthy young adults (students) and on children aged 2 to 12 years. The autorefractor readings were compared with subjective refractions of the young adults and with cycloplegic retinoscopy of the children. RESULTS: In adults, the accuracy of the handheld autorefractor measurements was comparable to that of conventional tabletop autorefractors. In children, the autorefractor measurements performed under cycloplegia were reliable; when cycloplegic agents were not administered, 24% were overcorrected by more than -2.0 diopters. CONCLUSION: Cycloplegia is often necessary to obtain accurate autorefractor results.