PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 5776236

Exercise for angina.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

1969-03-14. Exercise for angina.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5776236/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery.

A patient with severe angina will often be eligible for either angioplasty (PTCA) or bypass surgery (CABG). Results from eight published randomised trials have been combined in a collaborative meta-analysis of 3371 patients (1661 CABG, 1710 PTCA) with a mean follow-up of 2.7 years. The total deaths in the CABG and PTCA groups were 73 and 79, respectively, with a relative risk (RR) of 1.08 (95% CI 0.79-1.50). The combined endpoint of cardiac death and non-fatal myocardial infarction occurred in 169 PTCA patients and 154 CABG patients (RR 1.10 [0.89-1.37]). Amongst patients randomised to PTCA 17.8% required additional CABG within a year, while in subsequent years the need for additional CABG was around 2% per annum. The rate of additional non-randomised interventions (PTCA and/or CABG) in the first year of follow-up was 33.7% and 3.3% in patients randomised to PTCA and CABG, respectively. The prevalence of angina after one year was considerably higher in the PTCA group (RR 1.56 [1.30-1.88]) but at 3 years this difference had attenuated (RR 1.22 [0.99-1.54]). Overall there was substantial similarity in outcome across the trials. Separate analyses for the 732 single-vessel and 2639 multivessel disease patients were largely compatible, though the rates of mortality, additional intervention, and prevalent angina were slightly lower in single vessel disease. The combined evidence comparing PTCA with CABG shows no difference in prognosis between these two initial revascularisation strategies. However, the treatments differ markedly in the subsequent requirement for additional revascularisation procedures and in the relief of angina. These results will influence the choice of revascularisation procedure in future patients with angina.

Angina Pectoris

First-year results of CABRI (Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation). CABRI Trial Participants.

The Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation (CABRI) is a multinational, multicentre randomised trial comparing the strategies of revascularisation by CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting) and PTCA (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. 1054 patients (820 men and 234 women) were recruited from 26 European cardiac centres. The average age was 60 years and 62% presented with angina of class 3 or greater. 513 patients were randomised to CABG and 541 to PTCA, and 93% and 96%, respectively, of those randomised underwent the allocated procedure. This first report presents data analysed by intention to treat and documents all deaths, major cardiac events, and the symptom status of the patients 1 year after randomisation. After 1 year of follow-up, 14 (2.7%) of those randomised to CABG and 21 (3.9%) of those randomised to PTCA had died. The PTCA group's relative risk (RR) of death was 1.42 (95% CI 0.73-2.76). Patients randomised to PTCA required significantly more reinterventions; only 66.4% reached 1 year with a single revascularisation procedure compared with 93.5% of patients randomised to CABG (RR = 5.23 [3.90-7.03], p < 0.001). The patients in the PTCA group took significantly more medication at 1 year (RR = 1.30 [1.18-1.43], p < 0.001). They were also more likely to have clinically significant angina (RR = 1.54 [1.09-2.16], p = 0.012); this association was present in both sexes but was significant only in females. CABRI is the largest trial of CABG versus PTCA to be reported so far. Its findings are consistent with previous studies, and add to the weight of information that clinicians need to discuss with patients when options for the management of severe angina are under consideration.

Angina Pectoris