PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 5807405

[Obstetrical emergencies].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R C Ribeiro. [Obstetrical emergencies].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5807405/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Anesthesia and delivery].

Close collaboration of an informed anaesthetist with the obstetrician, and respect of the security protocols in every anaesthesia must guarantee the well-being of pregnant women. The development of loco-regional anaesthesia for use in labour analgesia and caesarean section has reduced the indications and the mortality related to general anaesthesia. In the last 30 years, analgesia and control of loco-regional anaesthesia effects have been greatly improved. Loco-regional anaesthesia protocols are now safe for the mother and various. Epidural anaesthesia using low concentrations of local anaesthetics allows parturient ambulation. Intrathecal anaesthesia, with combined spinal-epidural technique, is mostly used for caesarean-section and for the early and late labour.

Anesthesia, Obstetrical

Re-evaluation of i.m. ephedrine as prophylaxis against hypotension associated with spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of 37.5 mg ephedrine i.m. in preventing hypotension associated with spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. METHODS: In a double-blind randomised controlled study, 40 patients (20 in each group) were given either 37.5 mg ephedrine or placebo i.m. The following parameters were recorded: (i) blood pressure; (ii) heart rate; (iii) ephedrine i.v. supplementation; (iv) umbilical venous blood gases and neonatal Apgar scores. RESULTS: The incidence of hypertension in the study group was 30% compared with 20% for the control group (P:NS). There was no difference in mean highest blood pressure or mean highest heart rate between the groups. The incidence of hypotension was lower but not significantly lower in the study group (50%) than in the control group (80%) (P:NS). However, the incidence of delayed hypotension was only 10% in the study group patients compared with 50% in the control group patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Giving 37.5 mg ephedrine i.m. prior to spinal anaesthesia was not associated with reactive hypertension or tachycardia. Intramuscular ephedrine provided more sustained cardiovascular support than intravenous ephedrine.

Anesthesia, Obstetrical