PubMed · 5900511
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
H R Hildreth. 1966. Tarsorraphy.. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1966.00970050093019
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
A detailed description of the anatomical relationships of the supraorbital nerve as it courses across the forehead and under the scalp cannot be found in most anatomy textbooks, and illustrations of the nerve beyond the superior orbital rim frequently misrepresent its course. Because the supraorbital nerve is a structure at risk in many plastic surgical techniques, the plastic surgeon would benefit from a clearer understanding of its anatomy and function. The supraorbital nerve was studied anatomically in 12 (24 half-head) fresh cadaver specimens, and its sensory distribution was studied in 30 living subjects using selective nerve blocks. Beyond the orbital rim, the supraorbital nerve has two consistently present divisions: (1) a superficial (medial) division that passes over the frontalis muscle, providing sensory supply to the forehead skin and only to the anterior margin of the scalp in 90 percent of the study subjects; and (2) a deep (lateral) division that runs cephalad across the lateral forehead between the galea aponeurotica and the pericranium as the sensory nerve to the frontoparietal scalp. When a forehead lift is performed, injury to this deep division causes most of the distressful sequelae of scalp numbness and paresthesia. Unlike the superficial division, the course of the deep division in all cadaver specimens and its sensory distribution in all living volunteer subjects was consistent. This study has application for any procedure requiring scalp or forehead incisions, such as the forehead lift and the endoscopic facial techniques.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
BACKGROUND: The use of lasers in cosmetic surgery has been expanded fairly recently to include blepharoplasties. Controversy exists as to the efficacy of this procedure. This survey is designed to gain an understanding of the efficacy of blepharoplasty performed by laser versus conventional scalpel techniques. METHODS: A group of surgeons who perform the procedure were questioned. Over 4,000 cases of upper and lower lid laser blepharoplasty were reported by the responding physicians. RESULTS: The results of this survey indicate that carbon dioxide is by far the most common laser used in laser blepharoplasty (96%). A laser is used as a sole cutting tool by 70% of the responders and as a sole hemostasis tool by 88% of surgeons. Overall, both the intraoperative time and postoperative recovery period were reported as significantly reduced when blepharoplasty is performed by laser as compared with scalpel. In general, the incidences of edema, ecchymosis, and postoperative pain were reported as less severe with laser. No serious complications related to the laser were documented by the survey responders. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that laser blepharoplasty techniques can be safe and effective in skilled hands and may even have some potential advantages over conventional blepharoplasty.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.