PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 591633

Streptococcus milleri in the appendix.

Abstract

The appendix was investigated as a possible habitat of Streptococcus milleri. Both normal and inflamed appendices were examined and the isolation rates compared. S. milleri was present in a quarter of the normal appendices and more than half of those associated with apendicitis--a difference that was statistically highly significant. The isolation rates throughout were indepencent of age. There was a pronounced connection between the presence of S. milleri in the appendix and the purulent manifestations of appendicitis. S. milleri was isolated from other abdominal sites associated with appendicitis. The frequency of isolation was increased by culture in an enrichment broth containing nalidixic acid and sulphadimidine.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P M Poole, G Wilson. 1977. Streptococcus milleri in the appendix.. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.30.10.937

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Appendicitis].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Appendicitis

Delayed primary wound closure using skin tapes for advanced appendicitis in children. A prospective, controlled study.

In a 3-year period, 63 consecutive patients with advanced perforated (n=53) and gangrenous (n=10) appendicitis were allocated to undergo either immediate wound closure or delayed primary wound closure after emergency appendectomy. The incidence of wound infection between delayed primary wound closure and immediate wound closure was similar (24.0% and 21.1%, respectively). The duration for complete healing of infected wounds was slightly shorter in the group undergoing delayed primary wound closure (mean +/- SD, 24.3 +/- 9.2 days) than in the group undergoing immediate wound closure (mean +/- SD, 32.6 +/- 16.5 days), but the difference was not significant. However, healing of noninfected wounds was significantly prolonged in the group undergoing delayed primary wound closure (mean +/- SD, 19.3 +/- 10.1 days) compared with the group undergoing immediate wound closure (mean +/- SD, 7.0 +/- 0 days). The latter had been shown to associate with more nonseptic wound complications and therefore required longer rehabilitation. Our study showed that delayed primary closure did not offer additional advantage over immediate closure in the treatment of wounds associated with advanced appendicitis in children.

Appendicitis