PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 5918061

Decremental and incremental visual thresholds.

Abstract

1. Extrafoveal decremental and incremental visual thresholds have been measured with a circular test-object of 57' diameter, an exposure time of 0.1 sec and background luminance ranging from 2.5 to 7.3 log. quanta (equivalent to 507 nm) per second per square degree at the cornea.2. The decremental threshold is lower than the incremental threshold by factors up to 0.4 log. unit when the background luminance is low; and the two thresholds are virtually the same when the background luminance is high.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A D Short. 1966. Decremental and incremental visual thresholds.. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Light and dark cause a shift in the spatial expression of a neuropeptide-processing enzyme in the rat retina.

Carboxypeptidase E (CPE, EC 3.4.17.10) is an essential enzyme in the post-translational processing of most neuroactive peptides. We have studied how the expression of CPE in the rat retina is modified in response to the light/dark cycle. Retinal CPE mRNA levels increase immediately after a change in lighting condition. After prolonged exposure to the dark or the light, however, CPE mRNA levels drop to comparable amounts. The increase CPE mRNA is most dramatic during the dark-to-light transition. Interestingly, during the same interval, CPE protein levels transiently decrease. This apparently contradictory change in mRNA and protein levels is attributable to a change in the spatial pattern of CPE expression in the retina in response to light and dark. Both in situ hybridization and indirect immunofluorescence studies indicate that CPE is expressed in photoreceptors in the dark. During light onset, CPE expression is rapidly induced in retinal ganglion cells, whereas expression in photoreceptors is reduced. This pattern is reversed when the animals are exposed to the dark. In contrast, CPE is apparently constitutively expressed in a subpopulation of cells in the inner nuclear layer in both the light and the dark. These changes in CPE expression are similar to light-induced changes in c-fos expression, suggesting that CPE may be a downstream target for Fos activation.

Adaptation, Ocular

Left and right visual field advantages are a function of scotopic and photopic retinal adaptation, respectively, in simple reaction time to near-threshold targets.

Modulation of stimulus luminance in a tachistoscopic face discrimination task has been found to significantly invert visual hemifield advantage in reaction time (RT) (Sergent, 1982a, Sergent, 1982b). However, there is no more physiological rationale for that than for a similar effect, say, of retinal adaptation, and it is even conceivable that the latter may have confounded the former in past experiments. The experiments reported here were therefore designed to tease out the relative contributions of stimulus luminance and of background illumination (i.e., retinal adaptation) in a simple RT task. Two equally difficult conditions of dim targets were set up, one with light-adapted subjects and one with dark-adapted subjects. Similarly, two equally difficult conditions of bright targets were set up with light and dark-adapted subjects. It was found that dim targets (near detection threshold) yielded a significant right visual field RT advantage in light-adapted subjects and that dim targets (equally near detection threshold) yielded a significant left visual field RT advantage in dark-adapted subjects. Future experiments will determine whether cone-mediated RT to detection is left hemisphere dominant and whether rod-mediated RT to detection is right hemisphere dominant.

Adaptation, Ocular

Fast disconjugate adaptations of saccades in microstrabismic subjects.

In normal subjects, saccade amplitude inequality can be induced almost immediately when the image is made larger for one eye. This disconjugacy allows binocular fusion at the point of regard despite the image size inequality. It persists under subsequent monocular viewing which suggests a fast adaptive mechanism. This study tests whether such disconjugacy can be induced in subjects with microstrabismus who do not have foveal fusion. Three microstrabismic subjects viewed a random dot pattern the size of which was 10% larger in one eye. Within 40 sec horizontal saccades became larger in the eye viewing the larger image by 4-10%; the induced disconjugacy persisted under subsequent monocular viewing. Thus, fast disconjugate adaptation is possible in microstrabismus demonstrating that foveal fusion is not necessary to achieve it.

Adaptation, Ocular