PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6023980

Electrical anaesthesia.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

1967-05-27. Electrical anaesthesia.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6023980/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Anaesthesia for caesarean section (epidural and general): effects on the neonate.

Anaesthesia may impair the condition of the neonate either directly (largely mechanically in utero or due to the influence of drugs) or indirectly via alteration of placental perfusion. These influences may further differ during normal caesarean section from those under complicated conditions. The criteria with which neonatal conditions are estimated need to be carefully distinguished with respect to results obtained. Neurobehavioural test results may give different information to the observer. A variety of drugs, not simply one, is used during general anaesthesia (GA). Even the consequences of maternal stress-fetal and neonatal levels of catecholamines or endogenous peptides may play a role. Local anaesthetics are known to cross the placenta as general anaesthetics do; in most cases, their effects are clinically irrelevant. Fetal and neonatal deliterious effects of regional anaesthesia (RA) are mainly related to maternal hypotension and the administration of large doses of local anaesthetics. If adequate doses of local anaesthetics and/or opioids are used, alterations in neurobehavioural scores are subtle and transient. Under normal maternal and fetal conditions, GA and RA are almost identically useful with respect to neonatal well being after caesarean section; subtle and inconsistent neurobehavioral residua may be present for a short period of time following GA. Under conditions of a compromised fetus, the neonate may however benefit from epidural anaesthesia more than from GA.

Anesthesia, Conduction

Regional ophthalmic anesthesia: safe techniques and avoidance of complications.

In the last decade, anesthesiologists have become increasingly involved in administering regional eye blocks, while providing care for patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery. This article describes the two major approaches to regional eye block, namely retrobulbar and peribulbar, with special consideration given to relevant orbital anatomy and technical guidelines. Potential complications, ocular and systemic, with their risk factors, are reviewed. Anesthesiologists wishing to acquire skill in administering safe regional blockade are encouraged to familiarize themselves with regional anatomy and specific guidelines suggested herein.

Anesthesia, Conduction

Short-stay carotid endarterectomy is safe and cost-effective.

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is conventionally performed following a contrast arteriogram, under general anesthesia, and with postoperative admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). We investigated whether any of these traditional adjuncts to CEA is necessary. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen consecutive patients had CEA performed according to a protocol of duplex scanning only, operation under regional anesthesia, and admission to the ICU only in cases of a proven need for services unique to the ICU (group I). Utilization of preoperative arteriography, admission to the ICU, postoperative complications, total hospital length of stay, and hospital charges were calculated for this group and results were compared with a group of 178 patients undergoing conventional CEA (arteriography, general anesthesia, routine ICU admission) during the same period (group II). RESULTS: In group I, 1 patient (6%) underwent preoperative arteriography and 4 patients (22%) were admitted to the ICU after CEA. Most group II patients (114 of 178, or 64%) underwent preoperative arteriography and virtually all (175 of 178, or 98%) were admitted to the ICU. Compared with group II, the average hospital length of stay for group I was significantly shorter (1.3 +/- 0.1 versus 3.1 +/- 0.3 days, P = 0.03) and hospital charges were significantly reduced ($5,861 +/- 229 versus $11,140 +/- 729, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that CEA can be safely performed without routine preoperative carotid arteriography; that routine ICU admission is unnecessary for the majority of cases; and that elimination of routine arteriography and ICU admission can reduce hospital charges for CEA by nearly one half.

Anesthesia, Conduction