PubMed · 6077360
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
B M Cameron. 1967. Plate fixation--how secure?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6077360/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
AIM: This investigation was carried out to compare Dimac wires with arch bars for interdental immobilization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The assessment was conducted on 50 patients who had mandibular fractures and in whom intermaxillary fixation was required as a part of the treatment. The time required for applying each method of fixation, the needle-stick injuries that occurred during their application, and the periodontal damage that followed interdental immobilization was investigated. RESULTS: The mean time required for the application of Dimac wires was significantly less than that required for arch bars. The needle-stick injuries were significantly less with Dimac wires. Patients reported difficulty with oral hygiene with arch bars in place. This was associated with periodontal damage following removal of fixation. CONCLUSION: Dimac wires is safer to use and less traumatic to the periodontium
Percutaneous transpediculate vertebroplasty is an innovative and successful treatment of painful osteoporotic and pathologic compression fractures that are refractory to medical therapy. Large-scale clinical series have shown that vertebroplasty can provide significant pain relief with very low complication rates. Expectations of positive results of the ongoing randomized trials are high. With the accumulation of scientific data, technological advancements, and acceptance by the general community, vertebroplasty may be become the standard of care for treatment of painful vertebral body compression fractures.
The increase in violent crime has lead to an increase in gunshot-induced fractures in the United States. Injuries to the upper extremity are common. The treatment of gunshot injuries depends on the extent of soft tissue disruption and the type and location of fracture. Most of these injuries are a result of low-energy gunshot wounds that may be treated conservatively under the appropriate conditions. Low-energy fractures that require operative stabilization may be done with predictable results for achieving union with intramedullary fixation or compression plating. Complex open fractures from gunshot wounds associated with neurovascular injuries present a therapeutic challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon. The fractures associated with these injuries often are comminuted and unstable. Bone loss is common. Soft tissue disruption plays a more important role in high-energy gunshot-induced fractures. In these cases, external fixation is the treatment of choice for stabilization. Recent advances in the use of external fixation have led to quick fracture stabilization, stability for vascular repair, and access to the wound for debridement and subsequent soft tissue surgery.