PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6149584

Inherited complement deficiencies.

Abstract

Isolated genetic deficiencies of individual components of the complementary system have been described in man for all the components of the classical pathway and the membrane attack complex as well as for Factor I, Factor H and properdin. It is only for Factor B and Factor D of the alternative pathway that homozygous deficiency states are not so far known. Complement deficiency states provide the most direct way of looking at the role of the complement system in vivo and emphasize the importance of complement in resistance to bacterial infection and in particular to infection with Neisseria. This association is not unexpected since in vitro studies have shown complement to be an efficient enhancer of phagocytosis and inflammation. The particularly frequent occurrence of neisserial infection may be ascribed to the ability of these organisms to survive in phagocytic cells so that the plasma cytolytic activity provided by complement is needed to kill them. On the other hand the strong association between complement deficiencies and immune-complex diseases--especially systemic lupus erythematosus--was unexpected and seems paradoxical in view of the large part played by complement in the pathogenesis of immune complex mediated tissue damage. The paradox can be explained in part by the necessity for an intact complement system in the solubilization and the proper handling of immune complexes. It is also likely that complement deficiency can allow the persistence of low virulence organisms that produce disease solely by an immune complex mechanism. Recently described deficiencies of complement receptors and their effects in vivo are described.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P J Lachmann. 1984-09-06. Inherited complement deficiencies.. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1984.0102

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A comparison between one first generation and three second generation anti-HCV ELISAs: an investigation in high- and low-risk subjects in correlation with recombinant immunoblot assay and polymerase chain reaction.

One first generation assay (manufactured by Ortho, test I) and 3 second generation anti-HCV ELISAs (manufactured by Ortho, Abbott, and UBI, tests II-IV) were compared. Sera from 4 different sources were used: (1) intravenous drug-users (IVDUs, n = 50), (2) blood donors (n = 1055), (3) all clinical samples from one day of routine anti-HCV testing (n = 89), (4) hemodialysis patients previously found negative by test I but clinically suspected to have a HCV infection (n = 11). Confirmatory anti-HCV tests were carried out with a second generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA II). In sera positive exclusively by test IV, one antibody consumption test (UBI HCV Neutralization EIA) and one further immunoblot assay (INNO-LIA HCV Ab) were used. PCR for HCV RNA was carried out on all hemodialysis patient sera and in the RIBA II positive blood donor sera. The second generation ELISAs discriminated 11 more positive samples than the first generation test (2 IVDUs, 5 blood donors, 4 clinical samples). The 9 sera from blood donors and clinical samples were all RIBA II positive or indeterminate. The second generation tests thus showed increased sensitivity. The second generation tests also showed increased specificity in that 4 samples that were positive by test I but negative by the second generation tests, were also negative by RIBA II. With few exceptions, all RIBA II-positive and most of the indeterminate samples were positive by the second generation ELISAs. With few exceptions, all the RIBA II-negative samples were negative by the second generation ELISAs. Eleven blood donor sera were positive by test IV exclusively where RIBA II and other supplementary assays were negative. The recently introduced second generation anti-HCV ELISAs were found to have a higher sensitivity than the first generation test. The tests also showed a good concordance with the exception of test IV in the group of blood donor sera.

Blood Donors