PubMed · 6155899
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1980. A missing dimension.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6155899/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
PURPOSE: To determine the relative impact of each category-based TEE indication according to the ASA guidelines. METHODS: In 851 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, TEE clinical indications were classified as category I or II according to the ASA guidelines. Category I indications are patients in which TEE is considered useful and category II are those where TEE is potentially useful but indications are less clear. All TEE examinations were reviewed by two anesthesiologists with advanced training in TEE. For each patient, the clinical impact of TEE in the clinical management was assessed using five criteria: 1) change of medical therapy; 2) change in the surgical procedure; 3) confirmation of a suspected diagnosis; 4) positioning of an intravascular device, and 5) substitute to a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). RESULTS: TEE had greater utility in category I than in category II indications (15/53 (28%) vs. 110/798 (14%) respectively) (P<0.01). The nature of the clinical impact was as follows: modification of medical therapy in 67/125 (53%), modification of planned surgical intervention in 38/125 (30%), confirmation of a diagnosis in 34/125 (27%). The impact on therapy was higher in complex surgical procedures (39%) than in valvular replacement (19%) (P<0.01) and coronary artery bypass surgery (10%) (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings validate the usefulness of the ASA practice guidelines demonstrating a greater impact of TEE on clinical management for category I indications than for category II. TEE also had a greater clinical impact in complex surgical procedures and in valvular replacement.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to generate a preoperative risk-of-death prediction model in selected neonates with congenital heart disease undergoing surgery with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. METHODS: We completed a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled neuroprotection trial in selected neonates with congenital heart disease requiring operations for which deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was used. An extensive database was generated that included preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables. Variables (delivery, maternal, and infant related) were evaluated to produce a preoperative risk-of-death prediction model by means of logistic regression. An operative risk-of-death prediction model including duration of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was also generated. RESULTS: Between July 1992 and September 1997, 350 (74%) of 473 eligible infants were enrolled with 318 undergoing deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. The mortality was 52 of 318 (16.4%), unaffected by investigational drug. The resulting preoperative risk model contained 4 variables: (1) cardiac anatomy (two-ventricle vs single ventricle surgery, with/without arch obstruction), (2) 1-minute Apgar score (</=5 vs >5), (3) presence of genetic syndrome, and (4) age at hospital admission for surgery (</=5 or >5 days). Mortality for two-ventricle repair was 3.2% (4/130). Mortality for single ventricle palliation was 25.5% (48/188) and was significantly influenced by Apgar score, genetic diagnosis, and admission age. The preoperative model had a prediction accuracy of 80%. The operative risk model included duration of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, which significantly (P =.03) increased risk of death, with a prediction accuracy of 82%. CONCLUSIONS: In this selected population, postoperative mortality risk is significantly affected by preoperative conditions. Identification of infants with varying mortality risks may affect family counseling, therapeutic intervention, and risk stratification for future study designs.