PubMed · 6176324
Error analysis in flow microfluorometry.
Abstract
Sources of error in a typical algorithm for the analysis of single flow-microfluorometric histograms are identified. A new statistical model for such data is presented, by means of which the error sources are quantitatively investigated. These theoretical investigations lead to three practical observations: A more detailed characterization of the fluorescence dispersion process is needed for a more refined algorithm. Levels of dispersion typically experienced are such that from a single histogram the distribution of cells within S-phase cannot be finely resolved; but the crude distribution of cells among the three phases G1, S, and G2-M may be accurately estimated. If currently typical levels of dispersion can be halved, then the S-phase distribution can be finely resolved.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Nedelman. 1982. Error analysis in flow microfluorometry.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02788551
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.