PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 618704

A psychological perspective for double-blind trials.

Abstract

Blind breaking is likely to occur in a long-term clinical trial involving subjects at risk. Double-blind conditions require subjects to live with ambiguity regarding their health status. It is unrealistic to expect them to tolerate this ambiguity over an extended period of time. A logical step for a subject is to break the blind and surreptitiously seek the best medical care available. Moreover, the staff assigned to monitor protocol adherence may further contribute to blind breaking because of ambiguity regarding their proper clinical role. Several steps are recommended to manage blind breaking within a trial, including improving the quality of medical care, more rigorous screening procedures, and maintaining a clinical environment that promotes accurate disclosure of blind breaking.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S M Zifferblatt, C S Wilbur. 1978. A psychological perspective for double-blind trials.. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt19782311

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗