PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6187767

Fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption double-staining test evaluation.

Abstract

The fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) double-staining (DS) test has been developed for microscopes equipped with incident illumination, and the procedure offers many advantages over the FTA-ABS test when tests are performed with this equipment. In this study, 346 fresh sera, including 35 from patients with syphilis, were evaluated by the FTA-ABS DS test. Parameters for investigation included two readers, each using a different microscope; a new FTA-ABS DS test reporting system; sera heated at 56 degrees C for 30 min versus unheated sera; and sera retested after at least 2 weeks of freezer storage. Agreement for FTA-ABS DS test readings between the two microscopes was 99%. Between-test agreement for the FTA-ABS test with the conventional reporting system and the FTA-ABS DS test with the new reporting system was 95%. Sensitivity calculations based on reactivity for the 35 syphilis sera were 94% for the FTA-ABS DS test and 91% for the FTA-ABS test. Specificity calculations based on non-reactivity of nonsyphilis sera were 98% for the FTA-ABS DS test and 93% for the FTA-ABS test. Differences in percentages appeared to be related to borderline readings in the FTA-ABS test. For example, if the same reporting system was used for the reference FTA-ABS test, the specificity was 97%. When sera were examined within 48 h, no difference was observed in results obtained with heated and unheated sera. Sera frozen for 2 weeks showed comparable results in the FTA-ABS DS test and the FTA-ABS test. These findings strongly support the recommendation that the FTA-ABS DS test be accepted as a confirmatory test for syphilis. The new reporting system for the FTA-ABS DS test would be advantageous for the reference FTA-ABS procedure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C E Farshy, E J Kennedy, E F Hunter, S A Larsen. 1983. Fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption double-staining test evaluation.. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.17.2.245-248.1983

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Complex adaptive systems: a response to Luchins.

Luchins (2003, Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 31(2), 183-186) distinguishes the mutual strengths and shortcomings of qualitative and quantitative approaches as applied to the complexities of evaluation psychiatric hospital functioning in particular, and behavioral healthcare practice in general. This brief response offers an examination of the complex interplay of factors within non-linear models in a conceptualization of complex adaptive systems for understanding causal factors in mental health administration as well as calling into question the myth of the relationship between measurement and hence control and understanding and prediction.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

In search of a familial cancer risk assessment tool.

Approximately one in three individuals will be affected by cancer in their lifetime in the United States, and some are at elevated risk because of family history. Although assessment of family history of cancer and cancer risk is the standard of care, the current health-care system appears unable to meet this need. Because individuals are increasingly using the Internet, web-based cancer risk assessment tools (CRATs) may provide a way to meet this need. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the types of familial CRATs available on the Internet and their nature. The current review evaluated five CRATs identified through an Internet search based on (i) their ability to identify those at the highest risk of cancer (i.e. those with hereditary cancer syndromes), (ii) their strengths and limitations based on criteria adapted from Rich and colleagues (2004, 2005), (iii) their readability based on four readability calculations, and (iv) their quality based on criteria from Health on the Net. The general limitations of CRATs as a whole were also delineated, including concerns about availability to those who are poor and underserved and those who have lower levels of literacy. Recommendations for future tools include assessing risk for a greater number of diseases, using theoretically driven approaches to increase the likelihood that individuals will engage in appropriate health behaviors, and making a greater effort to reach diverse populations.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research.

The overall aim of this study was to contribute to the development of metasynthesis through an analysis of the challenges involved. The study grew out of the critique of qualitative metaresearch raised by current developers of metamethodologies. Different views on the application of methodologies have emerged in the literature, contributing to confusion and ambiguity concerning the challenging questions of what, why, how, and who in metasynthesis research, which might increase the risk of misunderstanding. The roots of metasynthesis research are seen as multifaceted and influencing the development of the methods in different directions. The primary worth of metasynthesis is theoretical and/or methodological development (synthesis) combined with the potential for reflection: going beyond and behind the studies (meta). Metasynthesis research has also the potential to raise questions of research collaboration, culture, and language.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗