PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6214607

Models of illusory pausing and sticking.

Abstract

When identical dots moving at equal velocities but in opposite directions become coincident, a striking illusion occurs. The dots appear to pause momentarily, despite no objective change in velocity. Three models for the illusion were examined: A vector averaging model best accounts for the data. According to this model a motion system maps visual space and assigns motion vectors to each position on the map. When identical objects traveling at equal velocities but in opposite directions become coincident, they lose their phenomenal identity and a form system detects a single object. The motion system, however, has two vectors mapped onto the same position occupied by a now-single object. Since an object cannot move in two directions at the same time, the motion system averages the vector and assigns the resultant to the object, thus resolving the ambiguity. With equal but opposite vectors, averaging yields a zero resultant (null vector), and thus pausing is perceived. With unequal vectors, averaging yields a nonzero resultant and something other than pausing is perceived. Velocity and number of collisions strongly affect the magnitude of the illusion, but in all cases in which the illusion is perceived, the objects appear to stick together and move at a velocity near the average of the component velocities.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D M Goldberg, J R Pomerantz. 1982. Models of illusory pausing and sticking.. https://doi.org/10.1037/%2F0096-1523.8.4.547

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Rhythmic alternation and the optional complementiser in English: new evidence of phonological influence on grammatical encoding.

In a recall-based spoken production experiment, native English-speaking participants' variable use of the complementiser that to introduce the sentential complement in sentences like Henry knew (that) Lucy/Louise washed the dishes was found to be related to whether that inclusion/omission resulted in an alternating sequence of stressed and unstressed syllables between the verb of the main clause and the subject of the complement clause. This finding is discussed in relation to the question of whether and how phonological encoding can influence grammatical encoding in spoken language production.

Cues↗

Reversing the truth effect: learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth.

Repeated statements receive higher truth ratings than new statements. Given that repetition leads to greater experienced processing fluency, the author proposes that fluency is used in truth judgments according to its ecological validity. Thus, the truth effect occurs because people learn that fluency and truth tend to be positively correlated. Three experiments tested this notion. Experiment 1 replicated the truth effect by directly manipulating processing fluency; Experiment 2 reversed the effect by manipulating the correlation between fluency and truth in a learning phase. Experiment 3 generalized this reversal by showing a transfer of a negative correlation between perceptual fluency (due to color contrast) and truth to truth judgments when fluency is due to prior exposure (i.e., repetition).

Cues↗