PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6223821

Improving peritoneoscopic staging of patients with solid tumors.

Abstract

Peritoneoscopy and guided needle biopsy were carried out as the staging procedure in patients with solid tumors. The disease was disseminated in 379 patients with various tumor types and limited in 109 with breast cancer and malignant melanoma. Adequate liver biopsies were obtained in all cases. Macroscopic liver tumors were demonstrated in 96 patients. Eleven additional patients had peritoneal or mesenteric tumors with normal livers. Attempts were made to improve the yield of positive findings of the procedure. The cytologic examination of cells adhering to the needle after biopsy or optimizing visualization of the liver surface by using a fiberoptic gastroscope did not answer this purpose. A 7.2% increase in liver tumor detection was obtained by taking 4-6 biopsies at random or towards deep palpated nodules in macroscopically normal livers. The data, although difficult to interpret in terms of accuracy of the method, suggest that in solid tumors random samplings of normal livers could contribute to the diagnosis of otherwise undetectable liver metastases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Bleiberg. 1983. Improving peritoneoscopic staging of patients with solid tumors.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5379(83)90171-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗