PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6223850

[Pregnancy interruption from the pediatric viewpoint].

A Rett
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Therapeutic abortion is foremost a biological problem. The abrupt termination of the physiologic phenomenon of pregnancy is a sudden interference with the biology of the interaction between mother and fetus. Therapeutic abortion is also a psychological, a sociological and a political problem. Today therapeutic abortion is legal under certain condition and done by physicians. This review supports therapeutic abortion for prenatally determined abnormalities which have a scientifically high risk of defective offspring especially trisomy 21. Intensive genetic counselling prior to the therapeutic abortion is necessary. The last decision for the therapeutic abortion rests with the pregnant mother. The genetic medical problem is only part of the decision making since a number of familial, personal, religious and human factors are involved in the decision. The experience of the physician, his world view, his medical education, his knowledge of the psychological and physical and social anxieties of the pregnant patient also modify the decision making. The gynaecologist who carried out the therapeutic abortion needs to take these factors into account. Considering how difficult and depressing the development of severely mentally retarded persons is especially when they reach adulthood and how limited there life is by suffering, limitations and isolation therapeutic abortion is a valuable method to spare parents the stress of caring for severely mentally retarded offspring for years and decades.

Explore related subjects

Abortion, TherapeuticAmniocentesisDown SyndromeEthics, MedicalFamilyFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisAbortion, InducedBehaviorCounselingDecision MakingDelivery Of Health CareEconomic FactorsFamily PlanningFertility Control, PostconceptionHealthHealth PersonnelPhysiciansSocioeconomic FactorsEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Rett. 1983. [Pregnancy interruption from the pediatric viewpoint].. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1037102

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

The possibility of a universal declaration of biomedical ethics.

Statements on issues in biomedical ethics, purporting to represent international interests, have been put forth by numerous groups. Most of these groups are composed of thinkers in the tradition of European secularism, and do not take into account the values of other ethical systems. One fifth of the world's population is accounted for by Islam, which is a universal religion, with more than 1400 years of scholarship. Although many values are held in common by secular ethical systems and Islam, their inferences are different. The question, "Is it possible to derive a truly universal declaration of biomedical ethics?" is discussed here by examining the value and extent of personal autonomy in Western and Islamic biomedical ethical constructs. These constructs are then tested vis-à-vis the issue of abortion. It is concluded that having a universal declaration of biomedical ethics in practice is not possible, although there are many conceptual similarities and agreements between secular and Islamic value systems, unless a radical paradigm shift occurs in segments of the world's deliberative bodies. The appellation "universal" should not be used on deliberative statements unless the ethical values of all major schools of thought are satisfied.

Abortion, Therapeutic↗
PubMed2006

Information for patients undergoing a prenatal diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: Lack of information is a frequent complaint with regard to physicians dealing with prenatal diagnosis (PD). The aim of the study was to find out how information on PD was perceived by patients and if they considered that they had been correctly informed by their physicians. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in Lariboisière Hospital (Paris) with 86 patients undergoing prenatal diagnosis between 2001 and 2003. A 23-item questionnaire was given to patients after delivery or termination of pregnancy (TP). RESULTS: Fifty patients out of 86 answered the questionnaire. Twelve patients out of 50 underwent a TP. Information on foetal anomaly was insufficient for 11 patients out of 50 (22%). Some patients found the information too technical; others would like to see photos to illustrate the anomalies and the possible surgical repairs to be performed. Information was insufficient for one in four patients concerning maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome. Information before amniocentesis was considered sufficient by 9 out of 10 patients. Information on the risks of TP was not given or not understood by 10 out of 12 patients. CONCLUSION: Information on prenatal diagnosis could be improved by using simple and accessible language, supported by written documents and photos for certain anomalies. More information should be given in cases of abstract anomalies and should be adapted to the social, ethnic and cultural background of the patient.

Abortion, Therapeutic↗