PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 623593

Method to quantify ride comfort and allowable accelerations.

Abstract

When the motion of a vehicle includes "shocks" or impulsive velocity changes, R.M.S. acceleration has no relation to crew comfort or injury. Existing (R.M.S. G) methods of ride assessment can show lethal accelerations as being perfectly safe, and vice versa. It follows that R.M.S. acceleration is not meaningful for nonsinusoidal "random" vibration either. This paper presents a method of evading the difficulty, using fairly well established biodynamic modeling techniques, and an extension of Allen's "shock tolerance" concept. Among other advantages, the method "automates" the assessment of ride quality so that personal judgments are not involved and the relative ride quality of different vehicles can be placed on a quantitative basis. Since this work was inspired by the problem of Navy crew tolerance to the motions of high-speed ships, the discussion is in those terms. Also, the proposed criteria should probably be scaled down for more general populations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P R Payne. 1978. Method to quantify ride comfort and allowable accelerations.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/623593/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Does the type of prehension influence the kinematics of reaching?

Kinematic studies have indicated that when a subject reaches to grasp an object, the movement consists of two primary components: (a) a transport phase whereby the hand is brought towards the object and (b) a grip phase whereby the hand changes shape in anticipation of the grasp. Using a visual perturbation paradigm, we investigated the effect of different grip component strategies upon the transport phase. The distal strategy was determined by the size of the object to be grasped: for the small object (1.5 cm o.d.) subjects naturally adopted a precision grip between the index finger and thumb; for the large object (6 cm o.d.) subjects used a whole hand prehensile grip. During 20% of the reaching trials the perturbation was introduced by unexpectedly changing the object size. The results showed that corrections to the distal program in response to the perturbation were preceded by changes in the deceleration phase of the proximal component. The data supported previous findings of two visuo-motor channels for this prehensile movement but indicated that when unanticipated shifts of only the distal program are required, both channels show modifications.

Acceleration