PubMed · 6364309
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
F Mégraud, J Latrille. 1983-09-01. [Genital samples].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6364309/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
AIM: To investigate the use of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the routine laboratory for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. METHODS: Samples were divided and processed separately for the detection of M tuberculosis by microscopy, culture and PCR. After DNA extraction, PCR was performed with primers specific for the insertion element IS6110 and the product was analysed by agarose gel electrophoresis, Southern blotting or dot blotting and hybridisation with a digoxigenin labelled internal probe. Each sample was tested for inhibitors of Taq polymerase with the aid of an internal control. Multiple negative and positive controls were used to monitor each step of the procedure. RESULTS: The data from two laboratories, using the same operating procedures, were combined. Of 1957 specimens, 79 (4%) were culture and PCR positive, while 1839 (93.9%) were negative in both tests. Thirty specimens (1.5%) were PCR positive only and nine (0.5%) were culture positive but PCR negative. CONCLUSION: Using culture and clinical history as the gold standard, sensitivity and specificity for PCR were 92.1% and 99.8%, respectively. With elaborate precautions, PCR is a suitable and reliable method for the detection of M tuberculosis in clinical samples in a routine microbiology laboratory.
BACKGROUND: Although a number of tests have been described to detect the presence of Helicobacter pylori in biopsy specimens, studies of positive and negative value have largely been performed on untreated patients; testing the reliability of posttherapy has not been done. METHODS: We examined the value of the number and site of biopsies performed and the method used for specimen evaluation posttherapy. For postantimicrobial therapy of 141 patients with previously confirmed H. pylori infection, three biopsies were taken, two from the antrum and one from the corpus. Individual slides were coded, randomized, and interpreted blindly by two pathologists. Furthermore, in 143 patients, a biopsy specimen was taken from the antrum and was immediately inserted into the gel of the rapid urease test, and the results were compared with those obtained from histopathology obtained at the same time. RESULTS: In 71 patients, H. pylori therapy was unsuccessful; in 61 (86%), all three sites were positive. The highest yield with a single large cup biopsy specimen was 94%; the lowest was 91%. Two antral biopsies were negative in 4% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1-12%]. The combination of a biopsy from the angulus incisura and one from the greater curvature of the corpus correctly identified all treatment failures (95% CI = 95-100%). The rapid urease test was false-negative in 5% (95% CI = 1-13%); there were no false-positives. CONCLUSION: Use of either the rapid urease test or two antral biopsies for evaluation of success of antimicrobial therapy for H. pylori infection will result in a false declaration of cure in at least 5% of cases. Three large cup gastric mucosal biopsies for histology are recommended for evaluation of the success of anti-H. pylori therapy.
OBJECTIVES: Determine sensitivity and specificity of a new urease reagent strip (URS) test for detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens. METHODS: Six paired biopsy specimens were obtained from the greater curvature of the distal antrum, the lesser curvature near the incisura, and the corpus along the greater curvature during 66 procedures on 59 patients with endoscopic findings of gastric antral mucosal erythema or erosions, or gastric or duodenal ulcers. One biopsy from each site was tested with the URS. The second was evaluated with histology. A final antral biopsy was evaluated with a urea/gel test. RESULTS: Twenty-eight of the 66 cases were histologically positive, with H. pylori observed in at least one of the three biopsy sites. The URS test correctly identified all 28. Of 193 individual biopsy specimens, 78 were positive for H. pylori. The URS correctly identified 77. Sensitivity was 0.99, specificity 0.95, positive predictive value 0.93, negative predictive value 0.99, and kappa 0.92. Average time to positive was 20 min. Twenty-seven antral biopsies were histologically positive for H. pylori. The URS test correctly identified all 27, whereas the urea/gel test correctly identified 21. For antral sites, URS sensitivity was 1.00 and specificity 0.95 versus urea/gel test sensitivity of 0.75 and specificity of 1.00. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, the URS test is as accurate as histology in diagnosing H. pylori infections, and it provides results in less time and at a lower cost than histology.