PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6379544

Diagnostic methods in orbital diseases.

Abstract

Development of diagnostic methods for orbital diseases have practically revolutionized the approach to the patient with orbital disease. These newer methods have helped the clinician to improve the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis prior to biopsy, to localize the area to be biopsied, and to prevent inappropriate surgery. These techniques have also allowed the pathologist to render more definitive diagnosis. These methods include ultrasound, computerized axial tomography, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, fine-needle aspiration biopsy, histochemistry, immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy. The techniques are complementary, and use of each depends on the clinical situation. Some techniques require collaboration between the surgeon and pathologist to assure proper fixation and preparation of tissues.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M C Kincaid, W R Green. 1984. Diagnostic methods in orbital diseases.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(84)34254-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗