PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6382045

Curved biopsy needle for stereotactic surgery: a technical note.

Abstract

Needle brain biopsy and aspiration is an important technique for the diagnosis of tumors and for the evacuation of fluid collections. Current biopsy methods use a straight needle, which has the disadvantage of requiring multiple passes through the overlying brain to obtain multiple biopsies. Furthermore, a straight needle does not give optimal samples of tumor for diagnosis because the needle passes through the viable rim of the tumor instead of along it. We are reporting a curved plastic biopsy needle suitable for computed tomography-guided biopsy. It remains inside an outer guide catheter that holds it straight until it reaches the edge of the tissue to be biopsied. At this point, the needle is advanced beyond the guide catheter and obtains the biopsy sample by passing around the edge of a tumor. This can in principle produce an improvement in diagnostic yield. Furthermore, multiple biopsies of the tumor from a single guide catheter position are possible. The surgeon rotates the curved needle within its guide catheter to redirect it before the needle emerges, and a different biopsy is then obtained without reinsertion. This avoids multiple punctures of the overlying uninvolved tissue. We are reporting the technique and beginning an evaluation of it.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W J Levy, J J Oro. 1984. Curved biopsy needle for stereotactic surgery: a technical note.. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198407000-00015

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗