PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6403342

Progabide: a controlled trial in partial epilepsy.

Abstract

Progabide (SL 76002) was studied in a randomized double-blind crossover trial using 20 outpatients suffering from partial complex seizures. Progabide was added to the concomitant antiepileptic treatment in a fixed dosage schedule. The design included an open therapy control unit. No significant difference was established between the number of partial seizures during treatment with progabide and placebo. A trend was observed for lower seizure frequency of secondary generalized seizures during treatment with progabide. Only mild and transient side effects were observed. There was no difference between the side effects of progabide and placebo.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Dam, L Gram, A Philbert, B S Hansen, B B Lyon, J M Christensen, H R Angelo. 1983. Progabide: a controlled trial in partial epilepsy.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1983.tb04873.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of zonisamide (zonegran) in the treatment of essential tremor.

Medical therapy for essential tremor (ET), a common movement disorder, is often inadequate. We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide (ZNS), an antiepileptic agent, in treating ET. Twenty patients (mean age, 60 +/- 15 years) with ET were randomized to receive ZNS or placebo. ZNS was initiated at a dosage of 100 mg/day and escalated to 200 mg/day at day 14. Patients were evaluated by accelerometry and the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) rating scale at baseline and days 14 and 28, as well as the Clinical Global Impression (CGI-C) scale at day 28. At endpoint, subjects assigned to ZNS were taking a mean dosage of 160 +/- 50 mg/day. There were no significant improvements in the FTM total score or its subsections. Tremor amplitude as assessed by accelerometry significantly improved in the ZNS group compared to the placebo group at endpoint relative to baseline (-0.50 +/- 0.72 vs. 0.30 +/- 0.79 m/s(2); P = 0.03). On the CGI-C, 60% (n = 6) of patients in the ZNS group felt that their tremor was unchanged, while the remaining patients felt that their tremor was "minimally improved." Thirty percent (n = 3) of patients taking ZNS discontinued the study due to side effects (fatigue, headache, paresthesias) while taking 100 mg per day. ZNS did not provide significant improvements in clinical rating scales at study endpoint compared to placebo and was only modestly well tolerated. ZNS was effective in reducing tremor amplitude as measured by accelerometry.

Anticonvulsants↗