PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6410422

A device for checking electron energies.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N M Procter. 1983. A device for checking electron energies.. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155%2F28%2F6%2F014

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Technical note: reconstructing dose distributions from manually planned electron boosts in breast radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: In breast radiotherapy, delivery of manually-calculated electron boosts limits retrospective dose-response analyses as dose distribution is unavailable. This work evaluates the feasibility of reconstructing dose distributions from manually planned electron boosts in breast-conserving radiotherapy. METHODS: Only 72 out of 198 breast cancer patients had complete stored dose distributions from sequential electron boosts in the REQUITE study. Arbitrary data from 70/72 patients were used to develop and validate dose reconstruction method. Twenty patients were used to determine optimal parameters for Monte-Carlo-based (MC) electron dose reconstruction on RayStation (v.11B-R), considering CT-calibration curve, MC-history number, andcalculation grid resolution. Remaining 50 patients were used to quantify dose reconstruction accuracy. The similarity between reconstructed and stored dose was evaluated using 3D-gamma index and dosimetric parameters extracted from breast and tumour bed contours. Dose difference location was evaluated using dose-location histogram. RESULTS: Calculation grid resolution significantly impacted electron dose distribution (p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.01), where the finest grid (0.15&#xa0;cm) showed highest similarity to stored doses. CT-calibration curve and MC-history number had a negligible influence on dose reconstruction. Dosimetric difference between reconstructed and stored doses was&#xa0;<&#xa0;1&#xa0;Gy for breast and tumour bed. Reconstructed dose was achieved&#xa0;>&#xa0;90% gamma passing rate in the validation set. However, around 2.5&#xa0;Gy dose differences were observed at the skin and tissue interface regions. CONCLUSIONS: Retrospective electron boost dose reconstruction is feasible with acceptable accuracy, and could increase data completeness in large cohort studies. Caution is advised when assessing dose near tissue interface and further validation is needed outside the REQUITE dataset.

Electrons

Probing substrate binding site of the Escherichia coli quinol oxidases using synthetic ubiquinol analogues.

Substrate binding sites of the Escherichia coli bo- and bd-type quinol oxidases were probed with systematically synthesized ubiquinol analogues. The apparent Km values of ubiquinol-2 derivatives to the bo-type enzyme were much lower than that of the corresponding 6-n-decyl derivatives. The isoprenoid structure is less hydrophobic than the saturated n-alkyl group with the same carbon number; therefore, the native isoprenoid side chain appears to play a specific role in quinol binding besides simply increasing hydrophobicity of the molecule. The Vmax values of 2-methoxy-3-ethoxy analogues were greater than that of 2-ethoxy-3-methoxy analogues irrespective of the side chain structure. This result indicates not only that a methoxy group in the 2-position is recognized more strictly than the 3-position by the binding site but also that the side chain structure does not affect binding of the quinol ring moiety. Systematic analysis of the electron-donating activities of the analogues with different substituents in the 5-position revealed that the 5-methyl group is important for the activity. In the parallel studies with the bd-type enzyme, we obtained similar observations except that almost all quinol analogues, but not ubiquinol-1, elicited a remarkable substrate inhibition at higher concentrations. These results indicate that the two structurally unrelated terminal oxidases share common structural properties for the quinol-oxidation site.

Electrons

Electron beams and ion composition measured at Io and in its torus.

Intense, magnetic field-aligned, bidirectional, energetic (>15 kiloelectron volts) electron beams were discovered by the Galileo energetic particles detector during the flyby of Io. These beams can carry sufficient energy flux into Jupiter's atmosphere to produce a visible aurora at the footprint of the magnetic flux tube connecting Io to Jupiter. Composition measurements through the torus showed that the spatial distributions of protons, oxygen, and sulfur are different, with sulfur being the dominant energetic (> approximately 10 kiloelectron volts per nucleon) ion at closest approach.

Electrons