PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6428236

The Medicare prospective payment system.

Abstract

In 1983 Congress adopted the most significant change in the Medicare program since its inception in 1965. Along with measures to ensure the solvency of the Social Security System into the next century, Congress approved a system of prospective payment for hospital inpatient services, whereby hospitals are paid a fixed sum per case according to a schedule of diagnosis related groups (DRGs). The program will be phased in over a four-year period that began October 1, 1983. Several types of hospitals and distinct part units of general hospitals are excluded from the system until 1985, when Congress will receive a report on a method of paying them prospectively. Information used to calculate the DRG rates was published September 1, 1983, as part of the interim final regulations. Other third party payers, such as state Medicaid systems and insurance companies, are considering converting to this method of payment, and several have adopted it. The implications for occupational therapy include a greater emphasis on reducing hospital length of stay, expanding outpatient care, increasing productivity, and a trend toward documentation and accounting consistent with computer technology.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S J Scott. 1984. The Medicare prospective payment system.. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.38.5.330

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Reliability of diagnoses coding with ICD-10.

OBJECTIVE: Reliability of diagnoses coding is essential for the use of routine data in a national health care system. The present investigation compares reliability of diagnoses coding with ICD-10 between three groups of coding subjects. METHOD: One hundred and eighteen students coded 15 diagnoses lists, 27 medical managers from hospitals 34 discharge letters, and 13 coding specialists 12 discharge letters. Agreement in principal diagnosis was assessed using Cohen's Kappa and the fraction of coincidences over the number of pairs, agreement for the full set of diagnoses with a previously developed measure p(om). RESULTS: Kappa values were fair (managers) or moderate (coders) for terminal codes with 0.27 and 0.42 (agreement 29.2% versus 46.8%), substantial for the chapter level with 0.71 and 0.72 (agreement 78.3% versus 80.8%). p(om) was lower for the full set of diagnoses than for principal diagnoses, for example in case of managers with 0.21 versus 0.29 for terminal codes. Best results were achieved by students coding diagnoses lists. In summary, the results are remarkably lower than in earlier publications. CONCLUSION: The refinement of the ICD-10 accompanied by innumerous coding rules has established a complex environment that leads to significant uncertainties even for experts. Use of coded data for quality management, health care financing, and health care policy requires a remarkable simplification of ICD-10 to receive a valid image of health care reality.

Diagnosis-Related Groups↗