The therapeutic object relationship.

Abstract

This paper introduces the concept of the therapeutic object relationship in order to clarify our understanding of the nature of fully analytic work with the more regressive patient, which has unsystematically developed over the last 30 or 40 years. The need for such a clarifying concept seems to arise from several sources. Our analytic work with the more regressed patient appears to entail a relationship demand factor which cannot be usefully treated only as resistance to the development of the transference. These are patients with what may be described as object hunger emanating from faulted ego development and a disordered internal object world. This object hunger cannot be adequately met within the framework of the tacit, ordinary, good-enough environment of the concerned and nonjudgmental analyst. In addition, the literature on this subject still dichotomizes the relationship factor of treatment from the transference. The concept of the therapeutic object relationship appears to offer the possibility of a clinical and theoretical unification between transference and relationship. The major point of the paper may be described in terms of the manner in which we have progressed from Eissler's parameter paper of 1953 to the widened scope of analytic work made possible by object relations theory, developmental theory and observation of infant and child development. The face of analysis seems to have undergone profound modification from the early classical model to one in which developmental maturation, in addition to making unconscious conflict conscious, has become a matter for our concern. This change seems to require seeing the analyst as a special form of real object with whom the patient passes through a revised version of certain developmental pathways. The therapeutic object relationship is viewed as a potentially unifying concept which may make possible higher degrees of generalization about the variously unsystematized approaches to analyzing the more regressive, but nonpsychotic patient. Some history of definition of the analytic relationship in terms of transference or relationship is presented. In the course of the paper the therapeutic object relationship is gradually defined as one of: primal intimacy; increased permeability of boundaries between self and other; intensive empathic interaction; the evolution of self and object definition in a context of intimate relation with an object that is instrumental in this process; and the activation of transcendant forms of symbolic-creative intercommunication.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)