PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6453929

Saccadic plasticity: parametric adaptive control by retinal feedback.

Abstract

Saccadic gain (the ratio of saccadic amplitude to target eccentricity) was experimentally altered as normal human observers made refixation saccades to the right, which caused step changes in the horizontal position of the target. Eye movements were monitored by diffuse infrared limbus reflection. We found that decreases in saccadic gain reached 60% of completeness, whereas increases were only 25% complete. This asymmetry in adaptive capacity may reflect the saccadic system's need to avoid overshooting a target. With a single target, adaptation is rapid (time constant = 6 saccades); if training is distributed over six different targets, adaptation is considerably slower (time constant = 57 saccades). Gain changes that result from training with a given target do not transfer strongly to other targets in the same horizontal direction and may not transfer at all to targets in the opposite direction. The gain of saccades to one target may be decreased, and simultaneously the gain of saccades to another target at a different distance in the same direction is increased. These results suggest that each element of a sensory-motor structure underlying saccadic plasticity is associated with a particular retinal or spatial sensory locus and can alter its motor response without much affecting the response of neighboring elements. This is consistent with the finding that distributed training slows adaptation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J M Miller, T Anstis, W B Templeton. 1981. Saccadic plasticity: parametric adaptive control by retinal feedback.. https://doi.org/10.1037/%2F0096-1523.7.2.356

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Neural adaptation of imaginary visual motion.

Observers made time-to-contact judgements about an imagined moving object that passed through an area of the visual field previously adapted to a single direction of real motion. The direction of imagined motion varied relative to the direction of adapting motion. When imagined motion was in the same direction as that experienced during adaptation, imagined speed was slowed; when imagined motion was in the opposite direction, its speed was increased; when adaptation and imagined motions were orthogonal, imagined speed was unaffected. The particular influence that prior adaptation has on imagined speed suggests that imagined motion and real vision may engage common neural mechanisms without being functionally equivalent. Negative aftereffects observed in imagined motion imply that the imagination represents movement as an inference from position changes of static images.

Eye Movements

On the role of extraretinal signals for saccade generation.

We investigated the accuracy of sequential saccadic eye movements, executed without visual feed-back. We found evidence that the final error of one saccade is corrected during the next, which supports the existence of extraretinal inputs to the saccadic generator. The corrections, however, were incomplete, which suggests that extraretinal signals are only partially effective.

Eye Movements