PubMed · 6461128
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A Résibois, A Toussaint, M Colet. 1982. DNA structures induced by mini-Mu replication.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6822(82)90473-1
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The two chemical steps of phage Mu transpositional recombination, donor DNA cleavage and strand transfer, take place within higher order protein-DNA complexes called transpososomes. At the core of these complexes is a tetramer of MuA (the transposase), bound to the two ends of the Mu genome. While transpososome assembly normally requires a number of cofactors, under certain conditions only MuA and a short DNA fragment are required. DNA requirements for this process, as well as the stability and activity of the ensuing complexes, were established. The divalent cation normally required for assembly of the stable complex could be omitted if the substrate was prenicked, if the flanking DNA was very short or if the two flanking strands were non-complementary. The presence of a single nucleotide beyond the Mu genome end on the non-cut strand was critical for transpososome stability. Donor cleavage additionally required at least two flanking nucleotides on the strand to be cleaved. The flanking DNA double helix was destabilized, implying distortion of the DNA near the active site. Although donor cleavage required Mg2+, strand transfer took place in the presence of Ca2+ as well, suggesting a conformational difference in the active site for the two chemical steps.
The Tn10 transposition reaction has been reconstituted in vitro on short linear substrate fragments encoding transposon ends. This permits the direct detection of protein-DNA complexes formed during transposition by gel retardation analysis. We demonstrate that a stable synaptic complex containing transposase and a pair of transposon ends forms rapidly and efficiently, prior and prerequisite to the double-strand cleavages involved in transposon excision. These observations extend the general analogies between the Tn10 and Mu transposition reactions, and also reveal significant differences between the two cases. The speed and simplicity of synaptic complex formation in the Tn10/IS10 reaction is suitable for a modular insertion sequence. In contrast, the relative slowness and complexity of this process in the Mu is necessary to permit transposition immunity and control of transposition by Mu repressor protein, two features specifically important for a temperate bacteriophage. Further dissection of the reaction leads to a tentative working model for events preceding the first double-strand cleavage.
Mutations induced by the integration of a Mu gem2ts mutant prophage can revert at frequencies around 1 x 10(-6), more than 10(4)-fold higher than that obtained with Mu wild-type. Several aspects characterize Mu gem2ts precise excision: (i) the phage transposase is not involved; (ii) the RecA protein is not necessary; and (iii) revertants remain lysogenic with the prophage inserted elsewhere in the host genome. In addition, prophage re-integration seems to be non-randomly distributed, whereas Mu insertion into the host genome is a transposition event without any sequence specificity. In this paper, we describe that the site of re-integration somehow depends on the original site of insertion. Two alternative models are proposed to explain the strong correlation between donor and receptor sites.