PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6473397

Adjuvant chemotherapy after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.

Abstract

At present there are no firm data for the routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II testicular cancer after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. The possible advantage of adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of reduced relapse rate and continuously disease free survival have to be weighed against the increasing cure rates with modern chemotherapy regimen, applied at the time of advanced and recurrent disease. About 10-15% of stage I and 40-50% of stage II patients relapse after RPLND. Depending on risk factors such as total tumor burden, histology and disease sites and symptoms at the time of presentation, 30-90% of these patients are brought into complete remission with modern chemotherapy (overall between 50 and 70%). Based on these results, a subgroup of patients with a low risk of relapse and a more than 90% chance of cure with salvage chemotherapy may be defined. They do not need adjuvant chemotherapy with its associated toxicity. On the other hand, in a high risk group, which demonstrates poor results with salvage chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy seems to have the potential to significantly improve the cure rate. A third group of patients, presenting with bulky abdominal disease may need immediate postdiagnostic intensive chemotherapy, with surgical exploration only at the time of maximum response. The question of definition of optimal treatment strategies in the various subgroups of patients with testicular cancer can only be solved by ongoing and future randomized clinical trials.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K W Brunner, R W Sonntag. 1984. Adjuvant chemotherapy after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6473397/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Sister Mary Joseph's nodule as presenting sign of a desmoplastic small round cell tumor.

Umbilical metastases, also named Sister Mary Joseph's nodules, are well documented in the adult population and most often represent an underlying intra-abdominal malignancy, usually a carcinoma of gastrointestinal or gynecologic origin. They are indicative of widespread abdominal disease and are associated with a poor prognosis. An extensive review of the literature reveals only two such presentations in the pediatric population. A 14-year-old male presented with an umbilical mass, which was found to be a metastatic lesion of a desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) of the abdomen. The diagnosis of an intra-abdominal malignancy, most commonly a DSRCT, should be considered in the presence of an umbilical mass in a child.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗

Cytology of desmoplastic small round-cell tumor: comparison of pre- and post-chemotherapy fine-needle aspiration biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Desmoplastic small round-cell tumor (DSRCT) is an aggressive malignancy of young adults, which is amenable to fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). As this entity is increasingly recognized and biopsied, cytopathologists are compelled to become familiar with the range of cytologic features of DSRCT. In addition, postchemotherapy tumors may be sampled to confirm disease recurrence before planning additional therapy. This study was designed to compare prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy cytomorphology of DSRCT and to evaluate for distinct chemotherapy-induced changes. METHODS: The authors searched their respective institutional databases for all DSRCT cases with an associated FNAB. FNAB slides, immunocytochemistry, and cytogenetic results were reviewed. RESULTS: Six aspirates from 5 patients were identified, 3 of which were postchemotherapy. The postchemotherapy cases demonstrated cytologic findings not typically described in DSRCTs, including prominent and conspicuous nucleoli, discohesive single-cell architecture, and slightly larger cell size. CONCLUSIONS: Cytomorphologic variability was prominent in prechemotherapy cases, and no case could be classified as DSRCT on cytology alone; immunohistochemistry was necessary for definitive diagnosis. Chemotherapy increased the spectrum of cytologic features. The most notable difference between the 2 groups was a predominantly discohesive single-cell pattern with conspicuous nucleoli in the postchemotherapy group, instead of the clustering pattern of medium-sized cells with inconspicuous nucleoli typically attributed to de novo cases reported in the literature.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗