PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6478325

Shock trauma.

Abstract

Trauma - accidental or intentional injury - is a major health and social problem. It is still the chief cause of death in people between the ages of 1 and 38 years. In the United States, the mortality due to trauma between the ages of 15 and 24 years increased by 13% from 1960 to 1978. During the same period, the mortality for people aged 25 to 64 years declined by 16%. Murders have increased from 8464 in 1960, to 26 000 in 1982. The overall death rate of American teenagers and young adults is 50% higher than that of their counterparts in Britain, Sweden and Japan. Trauma affects young, productive citizens, and the estimated costs for death, disability and loss of productivity exceed $230 million a day. The most tragic statistic is that at least 40% of the deaths are needless and preventable if better treatment and prevention programs were available. Trauma deaths that might be prevented are those due to motor vehicle accidents, homicide, burns, and alcohol and drug abuse. In this paper suggestions for prevention are made. They include improved crash worthiness of motor vehicles, revocation of drunk drivers' licences, use of devices that limit drunk drivers, increased tax on alcohol and random breathalyser tests, and the use of seat belts and motorcycle helmets. Control of hand-guns and burn characteristics of cigarettes could also reduce deaths. The problems and issues in trauma care can be divided into two broad categories: system and professional. System problems include prehospital care, in-hospital care, rehabilitation and prevention. Professional problems include education, research, economics, and quality.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D D Trunkey. 1984. Shock trauma.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6478325/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Was the pedestrian hit in an erect position before being run over?

If a pedestrian was run over by a car, the question can arise whether there was a preceding collision while the pedestrian was in an erect position. From a total of 53 selected autopsy reports, the findings associated with accidents known to involve running over in isolation (n=32) were compared to findings associated with a combined mechanism of a primary impact in an erect position and subsequent running over (n=21). Findings exclusively present in the combined group were wedge-shaped bone fractures ("Messerer"-wedges, 38%), glass fragment injuries (24%), traumatic amputations (10%), traces of car paint on the lower extremities (50%) and abrasions of the shoe soles (17%). These findings can be considered specific for a primary impact in an erect position. Fractures of the cervical and lumbar spine were present in the combined group in 33 and 17%, respectively. In contrast, in the run over group, there was only one case of fracture of the cervical and one of the lumbar spine and both cases involved direct contact with a car wheel. Fractures of the cervical and lumbar spine are, therefore, very indicative for a primary impact. "Bumper injuries", sacroiliac dislocations and fractures of the thoracic spine were approximately 2.5 times more common in the combined group than in the run over group. In the vast majority of cases, a clear differentiation between the two groups is, therefore, possible on the basis of the autopsy findings. This is especially relevant if an inspection of the car cannot be performed after a hit-and-run accident, which occurred in 26% of the cases in this study. In addition, the blood alcohol levels were higher in the run over group (mean=2.14g/l) as compared to the combined group (mean=1.53g/l).

Accidents, Traffic↗

Night driving, season, and the risk of highway accidents.

Official accident and traffic density statistics on Swedish highways were used to compute the relative risk (Odds Ratio - OR) of being injured or killed in a traffic accident at different times of day. After removing accidents due to alcohol 10344 accidents remained for computations, and the period 10:00h-11:00h was used as the reference point. The highest total risk was seen at 0400h (OR=5.7, Confidence interval = 5.6-5.8), with an OR of 11.4 (Ci=10.3-12.5) for fatal accidents at the same point. The same pattern was exhibited by single vehicle, head-on, and "other" (e.g., turning off the road) accidents, whereas overtaking and rear-end accidents did not show clear 24 hour patterns. Retaining alcohol-related accidents approximately doubled the nighttime peak for total accidents. During the winter, the peak of total accidents occurred at 03:00h (OR=3.8, Ci=3.5-4.0), five hours before sunrise, whereas the summer peak occurred at 04:00h (OR=11.6, Ci=11.3-11.9), shortly after the early summer sunrise and with consistently higher nighttime risk than for winter driving. It was concluded that early morning driving is several times more dangerous than driving during the forenoon. Apart from alcohol the effect seems related to sleepiness, but not to darkness.

Accidents, Traffic↗

Radiofrequency medial branch neurotomy in litigant and nonlitigant patients with cervical whiplash: a prospective study.

STUDY DESIGN: The efficacy of radiofrequency medial branch neurotomy to treat cervical zygapophysial joint pain from whiplash was compared prospectively in litigants and nonlitigants. OBJECTIVES: 1) To assess the effect of monetary gain on treatment of zygapophysial joint pain in cervical whiplash. 2) To determine whether radiofrequency medial branch neurotomy is effective treatment for whiplash. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The influence of litigation on treatment outcome is a subject of controversy in both the medical and legal professions. This is the first study to examine this issue in a prospective manner using a previously proven diagnostic and therapeutic method. METHODS: Sixty patients with cervical whiplash who remained symptomatic after 20 weeks of conservative management were referred for radiofrequency cervical medial neurotomy. The patients were classified as litigant or nonlitigant based on whether the potential for monetary gain via litigation existed. Each group underwent identical evaluation and treatment. Patients were observed for 1 year. Visual analogue scores and self-reported improvement were obtained before, immediately after, and 1 year after radiofrequency cervical medial neurotomy. RESULTS: Forty-six patients completed the study. The overall reduction in cervical whiplash symptoms and visual analogue pain scores were significant immediately after treatment (nonlitigants vs. litigants: 2.0 vs. 2.5, P = 0.36) and at 1 year (nonlitigants vs. litigants: 2.9 vs. 4.0, P = 0.05). One-year follow-up scores were higher than immediate post-treatment scores (nonlitigants vs. litigants: 2.5 vs. 3.6). The difference between litigants and nonlitigants in the degree of symptomatology or response to treatment did not reach significance. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the potential for secondary gain in patients who have cervical facet arthropathy as a result of a whiplash injury does not influence response to treatment. These data contradict the common notion that litigation promotes malingering. This study also confirms the efficacy of radiofrequency medial branch neurotomy in the treatment of traumatic cervical facet arthropathy.

Accidents, Traffic↗