PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 6481104

[Fever during labor].

Abstract

The authors have studied the progress of labour and the neonatal consequences for 100 patients who started labour with a high temperature. A control group consisted of 100 patients with normal temperature and the comparison showed that there was a raised risk of dystocia and of fetal distress during labour. The maternal and neonatal complications were studied in relationship to the aetiology, which was most frequently premature rupture of the membranes. The authors suggest the way these cases should be managed to lessen the maternal and neonatal risk which is associated with pyrexia in labour. These are: culturing blood, urine and a vaginal or, better still, endocervical swab; giving penicillin with gentamycin and metronidazole throughout the labour and in the first few days after delivery. Very careful monitoring should also be carried out.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Berland, P Mallecourt, J Bourgeois, M Bethenod, M Dumont. 1984. [Fever during labor].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6481104/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Infections in intensive care units. A challenge for the specialist of infectious diseases?].

There is an obvious need for teamwork between different specialists on the diagnosis and treatment of patients in an intensive care unit. The infectious disease specialist must contribute by establishing definite and quick diagnosis of infections and by employing an adequate and sensible antibiotic policy for successful treatment. The local microbiological flora should be kept at an acceptable level of resistance to antibiotics, and preventive measures should be chosen carefully. To achieve this goal, extensive knowledge on antibiotics and microbial epidemiology is essential.

Bacterial Infections

Sensitivity and specificity of oropharyngeal suction versus bronchoalveolar lavage in identifying respiratory tract pathogens in children with chronic pulmonary infection.

The purpose of this study was to compare the pathogens obtained by oropharyngeal suction (OPS) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in children with chronic pulmonary infections. Forty-four children (mean age of 6.1 years; range 4 months to 15 years) were included in the study (27 children with recurrent localized lung infection, 5 with bronchiectasis, 5 with cystic fibrosis, 2 with foreign body aspiration, 2 with bronchiolitis obliterans, and 3 with recurrent episodes of cough and shortness of breath). In 27 out of 44 BAL samples (61%) bacterial cultures were positive. The sensitivity of OPS in detecting the same BAL pathogen was 89% (24/27 samples), the specificity was 94% (16/17 samples), and the predictive value was 91% (40/44 samples). Hemophilus influenzae beta-lactamase negative was the main organism recovered from BAL in non-cystic fibrosis patients with recurrent or persistent pneumonia. We conclude that OPS is a simple and efficient noninvasive procedure which may be helpful in the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent or chronic pulmonary infection.

Bacterial Infections