PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 649879

Backward masking: detection versus recognition.

D E Bland·D R Perrott
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The backward detection masking of 10-ms tonal targets by a 150-ms tonal mask was contrasted with the backward recognition masking of the same tones by the same mask. The target-mask interval required for 75% correct performance was about eight times as great in the recognition condition as in the detection condition. Furthermore, a generalized improvement in performance occurred over the initial course of training in both the detection and recognition conditions. In a second experiment it was found that a remote mask produced greater backward recognition masking but less backward detection masking. That these differences were observed with the same subjects, at the same level of training, and with identical stimuli, indicates that procedural differences alone cannot account for the differences between backward detection and recognition masking.

Explore related subjects

Discrimination, PsychologicalHearingHumansPerceptual MaskingPsychoacousticsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D E Bland, D R Perrott. 1978. Backward masking: detection versus recognition.. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381840

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Human tactile discrimination of curvature when contact area with the skin remains constant.

A forced choice paradigm was used to measure the capacity of human subjects to discriminate the curvature of stimuli applied passively to the skin of an immobilized finger. The stimuli consisted of spherically curved segments with a base radius of 2.5 mm; thus the area of contact with the fingerpad skin was approximately 19.6 mm2 for all stimuli. There were 2 series of experiments. In series 1, the standard surface had a curvature of 286 m-1 (radius of curvature 3.5 mm); subjects were able to discriminate an increase in curvature of about 13%. In series 2, the standard had a curvature of 154 m-1 (radius 6.5 mm); subjects were able to discriminate an increase in curvature of about 18%. Thus, even when the contact area between the surface and the skin was invariant, humans were able to discriminate small changes in curvature using only information from the cutaneous receptors.

Discrimination, Psychological↗
PubMed1992

Segregation of mesh-derived textures evaluated by resistance to added disorder.

In the "figure detection task" the strength of segregation for a particular texture pair was estimated by the threshold amount of added disorder that prevented segregation of a textured figure from a textured ground. Disorder was either jitter in the orientation of the texture elements, or jitter in their xy positions, or a mixture of the two. Other procedures included lowpass filtering, and a task requiring discrimination between textured figures of different shapes. Orientation cues are weakly or inconsistently used for segregating mesh textures. The low spatial harmonics are very important. A new finding is that orientation and position jitter thresholds for a set of figure/ground texture patterns are often proportional. In a mixture the one disorder can be exchanged for the other.

Discrimination, Psychological↗