PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6506141

Systematic comparison of three basic methods of sample pretreatment for high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of antiepileptic drugs using gas chromatography as a reference method.

Abstract

Sera of epileptic patients which were routinely examined by gas chromatography (GC) were also analysed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Three basic methods for the pretreatment of samples for HPLC analysis were compared: protein precipitation by adding acetonitrile to the serum, direct serum extraction using ethylacetate, and partitioning of serum and buffer solution over a stationary phase and extraction with dichloromethane/2-propanol. The analytical performance and practicability of the three methods were tested under routine conditions. The following anti-epileptic drugs and metabolites were used in the comparison of HPLC with GC: ethosuximide, primidone, phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine, N-desmethylmethsuximide, and phenylethylmalonediamide.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

U Jürgens, T May, K Hillenkötter, B Rambeck. 1984. Systematic comparison of three basic methods of sample pretreatment for high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of antiepileptic drugs using gas chromatography as a reference method.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007691-198409000-00014

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of zonisamide (zonegran) in the treatment of essential tremor.

Medical therapy for essential tremor (ET), a common movement disorder, is often inadequate. We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide (ZNS), an antiepileptic agent, in treating ET. Twenty patients (mean age, 60 +/- 15 years) with ET were randomized to receive ZNS or placebo. ZNS was initiated at a dosage of 100 mg/day and escalated to 200 mg/day at day 14. Patients were evaluated by accelerometry and the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) rating scale at baseline and days 14 and 28, as well as the Clinical Global Impression (CGI-C) scale at day 28. At endpoint, subjects assigned to ZNS were taking a mean dosage of 160 +/- 50 mg/day. There were no significant improvements in the FTM total score or its subsections. Tremor amplitude as assessed by accelerometry significantly improved in the ZNS group compared to the placebo group at endpoint relative to baseline (-0.50 +/- 0.72 vs. 0.30 +/- 0.79 m/s(2); P = 0.03). On the CGI-C, 60% (n = 6) of patients in the ZNS group felt that their tremor was unchanged, while the remaining patients felt that their tremor was "minimally improved." Thirty percent (n = 3) of patients taking ZNS discontinued the study due to side effects (fatigue, headache, paresthesias) while taking 100 mg per day. ZNS did not provide significant improvements in clinical rating scales at study endpoint compared to placebo and was only modestly well tolerated. ZNS was effective in reducing tremor amplitude as measured by accelerometry.

Anticonvulsants↗