PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6507749

Diagnosing appendicitis during pregnancy.

K Masters·B A Levine·H V Gaskill·K R Sirinek
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In a 10 year period, 29 of 36 pregnant patients (81 percent) thought preoperatively to have appendicitis had the diagnosis confirmed at operation. Postoperative fetal complications included one intrauterine death and five premature births. There were no maternal deaths and morbidity was limited to atelectasis in five patients. Prompt surgical intervention in 90 percent of our patients did not prevent fetal complications.

Explore related subjects

AppendicitisFemaleFetal DeathHumansInfant, NewbornObstetric Labor, PrematurePostoperative ComplicationsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPremedicationJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Masters, B A Levine, H V Gaskill, K R Sirinek. 1984. Diagnosing appendicitis during pregnancy.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(84)90434-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Optimizing US examination to detect the normal and abnormal appendix in children.

BACKGROUND: US detection of a normal appendix can safely rule out appendicitis. However, there is a wide range of accuracy in detection of a normal appendix. OBJECTIVE: To optimize US examination to detect the normal and the abnormal appendix according to the potential positions of the appendix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 107 children who underwent gray-scale US scanning. Noncompressive and compressive graded sonography was performed to detect normal and abnormal appendices according to their potential positions. The maximum transverse diameter of the appendices was measured. RESULTS: Of the 107 children examined, 56 had a histologic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Sonography had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 98% for the diagnosis of appendicitis. A normal appendix was visualized in 44 (86.2%) of the 51 patients without acute appendicitis, and of these 44, 43 were true-negative and 1 was false-positive. Normal and abnormal appendices, respectively, were positioned as follows: 54.4% and 39.3% were mid-pelvic; 27.2% and 28.6% were retrocecal; 11.4% and 17.8% were deep pelvic; and 6.8% and 14.3% were abdominal. CONCLUSION: US scanning according to the potential positions of the appendix was useful in the detection of normal appendices in children suspected of having appendicitis.

Appendicitis↗