PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6517989

Shock in the operating room.

Abstract

Many factors may contribute to producing a shock state within the surgical environment. The classic causes of shock--hypovolemia, cardiac failure, and sepsis--occur commonly in the operating room. Additionally, concurrent surgery and anesthesia may contribute to produce clinical shock. Surgery may produce hypovolemia from "third space" loss and/or from blood loss. Some anesthetic drugs, by inhibiting the autonomic nervous system, impair the body's ability to compensate for hypovolemia, cardiac failure, or sepsis. Other entities such as tension pneumothorax, drug allergy, or mechanical factors produced by surgical exposure may contribute to hemodynamic compromise of the patient. Shock that occurs outside the surgical suite may also be produced by a variety of insults. One or more factors may contribute to inadequate tissue perfusion, thus making diagnosis of the cause(s) of shock a clinical challenge. Presented in this review is an anesthesiologist's approach to shock on a macrocirculatory level. Two important concepts are vital to this approach. First, one must act immediately to restore adequate perfusion to the brain and heart when confronted with a patient in shock. This is possible without knowing the specific cause(s) of the poor perfusion. Second, a rapid, accurate diagnosis of the cause(s) must be made if the patient is slow to respond to the initial therapy. Through the use of pulmonary artery catheterization, the factors producing any given shock state may be identified, and appropriate therapy may be instituted and monitored.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D L Wagner. 1984. Shock in the operating room.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-6757(84)90116-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of ketamine and norketamine after racemic ketamine or S-ketamine administration during isoflurane anaesthesia in Shetland ponies.

BACKGROUND: The arterial pharmacokinetics of ketamine and norketamine enantiomers after racemic ketamine or S-ketamine i.v. administration were evaluated in seven gelding ponies in a crossover study (2-month interval). METHODS: Anaesthesia was induced with isoflurane in oxygen via a face-mask and then maintained at each pony's individual MAC. Racemic ketamine (2.2 mg kg(-1)) or S-ketamine (1.1 mg kg(-1)) was injected in the right jugular vein. Blood samples were collected from the right carotid artery before and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 min after ketamine administration. Ketamine and norketamine enantiomer plasma concentrations were determined by capillary electrophoresis. Individual R-ketamine and S-ketamine concentration vs time curves were analysed by non-linear least square regression two-compartment model analysis using PCNonlin. Plasma disposition curves for R-norketamine and S-norketamine were described by estimating AUC, C(max), and T(max). Pulse rate (PR), respiratory rate (R(f)), tidal volume (V(T)), minute volume ventilation (V(E)), end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PE'(CO(2))), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were also evaluated. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of S- and R-ketamine administered in the racemic mixture or S-ketamine administered separately did not differ significantly. Statistically significant higher AUC and C(max) were found for S-norketamine compared with R-norketamine in the racemic group. Overall, R(f), V(E), PE'(CO(2)), and MAP were significantly higher in the racemic group, whereas PR was higher in the S-ketamine group. CONCLUSIONS: Norketamine enantiomers showed different pharmacokinetic profiles after single i.v. administration of racemic ketamine in ponies anaesthetised with isoflurane in oxygen (1 MAC). Cardiopulmonary variables require further investigation.

Anesthesia, General↗