PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 6530126

[Nonparametric estimation of 1-dimensional continuous distribution density functions using the continuous LOLINREG approximation].

Abstract

A nonparametric method for estimation of one-dimensional continuous probability distribution functions is presented. Procedures for calculation of estimation of the unknown distribution function and the distribution density will be discussed in their application. 2 items are what type of weight function may be chosen for the proposed local-linear continuous approximation of the empirical distribution function by the least squares method (LOLINREG), and upon what value of bandwidth- or smoothing parameter one optimally should settle. The latter problem is practically very important with respect to the quality of the estimation results. Examples of simulated measurements which come from a standardized normal distribution as random numbers serve to demonstrate the mode of working, the advantages as well as the limits of the presented continuous LOLINREG-approximation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Schmerling, J Peil, H Kupper. 1984. [Nonparametric estimation of 1-dimensional continuous distribution density functions using the continuous LOLINREG approximation].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6530126/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

UK Hip Trial.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Hip Dislocation, Congenital↗

Neonatal hip screening.

CONTEXT: A "missed" case of congenital hip dislocation (CDH) can be a disaster for the patient and the outcome may be poor. Considerable resources are expended on screening programmes to identify appropriate cases early but a recent change in terminology to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and a realisation that neonatal hip maturation is poorly understood has made it difficult to know who should be screened and why. STARTING POINT: Neonatal hip screening is well established although some experts feel that the effectiveness of clinical let alone ultrasound screening programmes is unproven. Several European countries undertake population screening, while selective screening occurs in 93% of UK units. K Holen and colleagues recently reported (J Bone Joint Surg 2002; 84-B: 886-90) a prospective randomised trial of just over 15 500 newborn babies in which they compare universal and selective screening programmes. With a follow-up of 6-11 years, one late-detected hip dysplasia was seen in the universal group compared with six in the selective group (not statistically significant). These investigators found, on the background of an excellent clinical programme, no additional benefit from universal screening and thus advocate selective screening. WHERE NEXT: The aims of a screening programme must be defined, then evaluated. A consideration of costs can never take into account family pain and distress. The results of the universal screening programme in Coventry, UK, are impressive and significantly better than results from other UK centres. If the Coventry results are the gold standard, then it is necessary to work out how this can be achieved elsewhere rather than worry about whether it is unachievable.

Hip Dislocation, Congenital↗