PubMed · 6532076
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
P Maquet. 1984. [Patellar constraint].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6532076/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
STUDY DESIGN: The biomechanical role of the cervical uncovertebral joint was investigated using human cadaveric spines. Sequential resection of cervical uncovertebral joints, including clinical anteromedial foraminotomy, was conducted, followed by biomechanical testing after each stage of resection. OBJECTIVES: To clarify the biomechanical role of uncovertebral joints and clinical anteromedial foraminotomy in the cervical spine and their effects on interbody bone graft stability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although the biomechanical role of the cervical uncovertebral joints has been considered to be that of a guiding mechanism in flexion and extension and a limiting mechanism in posterior translation and lateral bending, there have been no studies quantifying this role. According to results in quantitative anatomic studies, anatomic variations exist in uncovertebral joints, depending on the vertebral level, articular angulation, and relative height of the joints. METHODS: Fourteen human functional spinal units at C3-C4 and C6-C7 underwent sequential uncovertebral joint resection, with each stage of resection followed by biomechanical testing. The uncovertebral joint was divided anatomically into three parts on each side: the posterior foraminal part, the posterior half, and the anterior half. The loading modes included torsion, flexion, extension, and lateral bending. A simulated anterior bone graft construct was also tested after each uncovertebral joint resection procedure. RESULTS: Significant changes in stability were observed after sequential uncovertebral joint resection in all loading modes (P < 0.05). The biomechanical contribution of uncovertebral joints decreased in the following order: the posterior foraminal part, the posterior half, and the anterior half. Unilateral and bilateral foraminotomy most affected the stability of the functional spinal unit during extension, causing a 30% and 36% decrease in stiffness of the functional spinal unit, respectively. The effect was less in torsion and lateral bending. After sequential resection, there was a statistically significant difference between decreases in torsional stiffness at C3-C4 and C6-C7 (P < 0.05). The stiffness of the simulated bone graft construct decreased progressively during flexion and lateral bending after each foraminotomy (P < 0.05). Increased bone graft height of 79% returned stability to the preforaminotomy level. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to quantitate the biomechanical role of uncovertebral joints in cervical segmental stability and the effect at each intervertebral level. The effect differs because of anatomic variations in uncovertebral joints. The major biomechanical function of uncovertebral joints includes the regulation of extension and lateral bending motion, followed by torsion, which is mainly provided by the posterior uncovertebral joints. This study highlights the clinical assessment of additional segmental instability attributed to destruction of the uncovertebral joints during surgical procedures or by neoplastic lesions.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
STUDY DESIGN: The surgically relevant osseous anatomy of the human anatomy was carefully studied and described. The stability of cortical and cancellous screws placed in anatomic sites commonly used for internal fixation of the occiput was tested. OBJECTIVES: To define the bony anatomy of the occiput in quantitative terms and to measure the ability of cortical and cancellous screws inserted at sites commonly used for internal fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To the authors' knowledge, no previous studies described the gross anatomy of the occiput in specific relation to the internal venous structures in the cranium and to the biomechanical strength of screw fixation in different areas of the occiput. METHODS: Thirty-seven human occiputs were carefully measured using calipers. Thin sections from six such specimens were analyzed with specific attention to cortical thicknesses. Stability of screws placed in various locations in the occiput were tested in axial pullout. RESULTS: The thickness of the occiput varied from extremely thin to a 0.1-mm thickness in the region of the cerebellar fossa and increased to a maximum of 8.3 mm at the level of the superior nuchal line and at the transverse sulcus. Results of pullout testing showed that the cancellous screws were as strong as the cortical screws in this area. In areas of the occiput thicker than 7 mm, unicortical fixation was as strong as bicortical fixation. CONCLUSION: There is a wide variation in thickness of the bone of the occiput. The strength of screw fixation was proportional to the bone's thickness.